Appellant / Complainant
Sarika
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
₹23,63,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126059962022 by Sarika against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders because it ruled that the officer exceeded jurisdiction by granting 'compensation' instead of 'interest' for delay in possession, and determined that farmer agitations did not constitute force majeure.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding Appeal-736/2022 and Cross Appeal No. 760/2022, subsequently reserving judgment on the matter.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list this appeal alongside cross-appeal No. 760/2022 on 04.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a conflicting appearance at the High Court and rescheduled the hearing for July 2, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on May 2, 2024, following an update from the respondent's counsel that the matter is ripe for hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 03.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from both parties and rescheduled the hearing to 29.02.2024, directing the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 17.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on personal grounds and rescheduled the hearing to 11.09.2023, with a directive that no further adjournments will be permitted on that date.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for August 9, 2023.
For Order
The proceedings for Appeal-736/2022 were adjourned due to the respondent's counsel being out of station, with the matter rescheduled for hearing on 29.05.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed both parties to exchange copies via email and upload documents to the e-portal before the next hearing on 18.04.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the Lucknow Development Authority to file objections, warning that failure to appear or file will result in the matter proceeding ex-parte.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a 10-day extension to the respondent for filing objections to the grounds of appeal and directed that failure to comply may result in ex-parte proceedings on the next date.
For Order
The Tribunal treated the service of notice as sufficient due to delivery via post and email, while granting the respondent a 10-day extension to file objections.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the appeal for orders on 23.11.2022.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural requirements for service of notice and filing of objections/replies before the next hearing on 16.11.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126059962022-04-09-2024
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders because it ruled that the officer exceeded jurisdiction by granting 'compensation' instead of 'interest' for delay in possession, and determined that farmer agitations did not constitute force majeure.
Tribunal Order #0901126059962022-04-07-2024
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding Appeal-736/2022 and Cross Appeal No. 760/2022, subsequently reserving judgment on the matter.
Tribunal Order #0901126059962022-30-01-2023
The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the Lucknow Development Authority to file objections, warning that failure to appear or file will result in the matter proceeding ex-parte.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders because it ruled that the officer exceeded jurisdiction by granting 'compensation' instead of 'interest' for delay in possession, and determined that farmer agitations did not constitute force majeure. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders because it ruled that the officer exceeded jurisdiction by granting 'compensation' instead of 'interest' for delay in possession, and determined that farmer agitations did not constitute force majeure.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
from 31.05.2012 till 12.02.2019 (except from 27.04.2013 to 26.10.2016)
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Atul Tripathi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's orders because it ruled that the officer exceeded jurisdiction by granting 'compensation' instead of 'interest' for delay in possession, and determined that farmer agitations did not constitute force majeure.
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding Appeal-736/2022 and Cross Appeal No. 760/2022, subsequently reserving judgment on the matter.
The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the Lucknow Development Authority to file objections, warning that failure to appear or file will result in the matter proceeding ex-parte.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.