up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126059702021

Appellant / Complainant

Lucknow Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Pallaw Kumar Sinha

Disputed Amount

17,75,000

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

37 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126059702021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Pallaw Kumar Sinha before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 122/10/2024

Hearing

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delay to an allottee who chose to continue in the project, as such matters fall under the exclusive purview of the Regulatory Authority.

3
Stage 212/09/2024

Hearing

The proceedings were adjourned at the request of both counsels, with the appeal scheduled for a hearing on 22.10.2024.

4
Stage 312/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file a reply to the respondent's arguments on legal points and scheduled the next hearing for September 12, 2024.

5
Stage 407/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 12.08.2024 for hearing, following a request from the respondent's counsel to align the date with a similar pending appeal.

6
Stage 516/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 07.08.2024.

7
Stage 616/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 716/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ready for hearing and scheduled the matter for orders/hearing on 16.05.2024.

9
Stage 814/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered the appeal to be listed for hearing on 16.04.2024.

10
Stage 922/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the appellant has carried out an amendment and provided assurance to file a copy within three days, subsequently scheduling the appeal for hearing on 14.03.2024.

11
Stage 1017/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the grounds of appeal to challenge the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer and directed the filing of an amended memo of appeal.

12
Stage 1113/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1205/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 13.10.2023.

14
Stage 1324/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 05.09.2023 following a joint request from the counsels for both parties.

15
Stage 1408/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to amend the grounds of appeal and directed that the amended copy be served via email, with a subsequent reply due from the respondent.

16
Stage 1529/05/2023

For Order

The Tribunal noted that the respondent's counsel informed the court that the appeal is ripe for hearing and subsequently scheduled the matter for a hearing on 08.08.2023.

17
Stage 1618/04/2023

For Order

The Tribunal noted that the respondent's counsel is unwell due to Covid and subsequently scheduled the case for orders/hearing on 29.05.2023.

18
Stage 1716/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant's request to list the appeal on 18.04.2023 to align with other similar appeals involving the same question of law regarding interest on delayed possession.

19
Stage 1813/03/2023

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 16.03.2023.

20
Stage 1902/02/2023

Further Order

No text available.

21
Stage 2016/12/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 02.02.2023.

22
Stage 2114/12/2022

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 16.12.2022 for further orders.

23
Stage 2225/11/2022

For Order

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for further arguments on 14.12.2022.

24
Stage 2309/11/2022

For Order

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's adjournment application subject to a cost of Rs. 2400/-, half of which is to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund and the other half paid to the respondent's counsel.

25
Stage 2421/10/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the counsel for the appellant and rescheduled the hearing for November 9, 2022.

26
Stage 2521/09/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for final hearing on 21.10.2022.

27
Stage 2624/08/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 21.09.2022.

28
Stage 2714/07/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for August 24, 2022.

29
Stage 2804/05/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for 14.07.2022.

30
Stage 2925/03/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned a 37-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing on 04.05.2022.

31
Stage 3028/02/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, and directed the appellant to remove registry defects before the next hearing on 25.03.2022.

32
Stage 3117/12/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove defects 3 and 4 before the next hearing and ordered notice to be issued to the respondent via registered post and email.

33
Stage 32Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059702021-17-01-2024

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the grounds of appeal to challenge the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer and directed the filing of an amended memo of appeal.

34
Stage 33Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059702021-22-10-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delay to an allottee who chose to continue in the project, as such matters fall under the exclusive purview of the Regulatory Authority.

35
Stage 34Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059702021-09-11-2022

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's adjournment application subject to a cost of Rs. 2400/-, half of which is to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund and the other half paid to the respondent's counsel.

36
Stage 35Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059702021-25-03-2022

The Tribunal condoned a 37-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing on 04.05.2022.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delay to an allottee who chose to continue in the project, as such matters fall under the exclusive purview of the Regulatory Authority. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: SBI Home loan rate MCLR+ 1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: SBI Home loan rate MCLR+ 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delay to an allottee who chose to continue in the project, as such matters fall under the exclusive purview of the Regulatory Authority.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

SBI Home loan rate MCLR+ 1%

Interest Period

from 31.08.2015 to 18.08.2017

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Khare

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Hridesh Srivastava

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059702021-17-01-2024

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the grounds of appeal to challenge the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Officer and directed the filing of an amended memo of appeal.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059702021-22-10-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the AO lacked jurisdiction to award interest for delay to an allottee who chose to continue in the project, as such matters fall under the exclusive purview of the Regulatory Authority.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059702021-09-11-2022

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's adjournment application subject to a cost of Rs. 2400/-, half of which is to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund and the other half paid to the respondent's counsel.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059702021-25-03-2022

The Tribunal condoned a 37-day delay in filing the appeal due to COVID-19 pandemic relaxations and directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder before the next hearing on 04.05.2022.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →