up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126059432022

Appellant / Complainant

Vipul Mathur, Ritu Mathur

VS

Respondent

Jaydev Infratech (P) Ltd.R.S. Resource Management Consulting Pvt. Ltd., R.S. Resource Management Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

jaydev infratech (p) ltd.r.s. resource management consulting pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Jurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

17 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126059432022 by Vipul Mathur, Ritu Mathur against Jaydev Infratech (P) Ltd.R.S. Resource Management Consulting Pvt. Ltd., R.S. Resource Management Consulting Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Jurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 105/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to amend grounds of appeal based on 'deemed registration' and dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint can only be entertained once an ongoing project is formally registered under Section 3 of the Act.

3
Stage 229/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel three days to research the legal basis for 'deemed registration' and the maintainability of the appeal before listing the matter on 05.02.2024.

4
Stage 304/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant's counsel to prepare briefs and rescheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 29.01.2024.

5
Stage 427/09/2023

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 514/08/2023

Hearing

No text available.

7
Stage 614/07/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to appear or file objections despite sufficient notice, and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 14.08.2023.

8
Stage 702/05/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 14.07.2023.

9
Stage 821/03/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

10
Stage 913/02/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their non-appearance despite service of notice and scheduled the matter for 21.03.2023 to consider the application for condonation of delay.

11
Stage 1011/01/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

12
Stage 1114/12/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted that the respondent was duly served and granted them an opportunity to file a reply to the delay condonation application and grounds of appeal, adjourning the matter to 11.01.2023.

13
Stage 1217/11/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent despite service of notice and ordered the appeal to be listed on 14.12.2022 for further orders after the appellant files an affidavit of service.

14
Stage 1312/10/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to serve the notice via speed-post and email, with the matter listed for 17.11.2022.

15
Stage 14Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059432022-05-02-2024

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to amend grounds of appeal based on 'deemed registration' and dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint can only be entertained once an ongoing project is formally registered under Section 3 of the Act.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059432022-14-07-2023

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to appear or file objections despite sufficient notice, and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 14.08.2023.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to amend grounds of appeal based on 'deemed registration' and dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint can only be entertained once an ongoing project is formally registered under Section 3 of the Act. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to amend grounds of appeal based on 'deemed registration' and dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint can only be entertained once an ongoing project is formally registered under Section 3 of the Act.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav
  • Vinay K Lakhani

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059432022-05-02-2024

The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to amend grounds of appeal based on 'deemed registration' and dismissed the appeal, ruling that a complaint can only be entertained once an ongoing project is formally registered under Section 3 of the Act.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059432022-14-07-2023

The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to appear or file objections despite sufficient notice, and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 14.08.2023.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for jaydev infratech (p) ltd.r.s. resource management consulting pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →