up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126059042021

Appellant / Complainant

Swagat Maity

VS

Respondent

Mahaluxmi Infrahome Private Ltd

Developer Firm

mahaluxmi infrahome private ltd

Disputed Amount

11,83,359

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionPromotional MisrepresentationJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

24 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126059042021 by Swagat Maity against Mahaluxmi Infrahome Private Ltd before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionPromotional MisrepresentationJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 131/05/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating commercial arrangements such as assured returns or Pre-EMI subvention schemes, which are considered independent commercial agreements between parties.

3
Stage 208/05/2023

For Order

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding a dispute over Pre-EMI/subvention scheme obligations and the validity of the Regulatory Authority's previous directions; however, no final ruling was issued as judgment was reserved.

4
Stage 327/03/2023

For Order

The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 08.05.2023 for orders or hearing upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties.

5
Stage 416/02/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to medical reasons and scheduled the next hearing for 27.03.2023.

6
Stage 516/01/2023

For Order

No text available.

7
Stage 609/12/2022

For Order

This text represents the header/caption of an appeal filed by Mr. Swagat Maity against Mahaluxmi Infrahome Private Ltd before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal; no substantive ruling or directive is contained in this excerpt.

8
Stage 715/11/2022

For Order

No text available.

9
Stage 811/10/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to recall the order closing their opportunity to file objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-, and directed both parties to upload their pleadings to the portal within one week.

10
Stage 912/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his unavailability and scheduled the matter for 11.10.2022 to consider a recall application.

11
Stage 1018/08/2022

Hearing

The proceedings are adjourned because the respondent's counsel is unavailable; the matter is rescheduled for orders on 12.09.2022.

12
Stage 1110/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an objection/reply to the application for recall of the order dated 16.05.2022 and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.08.2022.

13
Stage 1220/07/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's vakalatnama, directed the conversion of the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 10.08.2022.

14
Stage 1308/07/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 20.07.2022 to allow the respondent to file an application for recalling the ex-parte order.

15
Stage 1416/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to non-compliance with previous orders and directed that the matter proceed ex-parte against the respondent.

16
Stage 1525/04/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the respondent to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, warning that the matter may proceed ex parte if they fail to comply.

17
Stage 1631/03/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on April 25, 2022.

18
Stage 1708/03/2022

Notice

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request to issue fresh notice to the respondent and outlined specific procedural requirements for service via speed post and email.

19
Stage 1804/01/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify defects no. 4 and 6 and ordered notice to be issued to the respondent via registered post and email.

20
Stage 19Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059042021-31-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating commercial arrangements such as assured returns or Pre-EMI subvention schemes, which are considered independent commercial agreements between parties.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059042021-20-07-2022

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's vakalatnama, directed the conversion of the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 10.08.2022.

22
Stage 21Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059042021-16-05-2022

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to non-compliance with previous orders and directed that the matter proceed ex-parte against the respondent.

23
Stage 22Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126059042021-11-10-2022

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to recall the order closing their opportunity to file objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-, and directed both parties to upload their pleadings to the portal within one week.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating commercial arrangements such as assured returns or Pre-EMI subvention schemes, which are considered independent commercial agreements between parties. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating commercial arrangements such as assured returns or Pre-EMI subvention schemes, which are considered independent commercial agreements between parties.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 12Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Govind Krishna Srivastava
  • Tarun Arora

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Saurabh Misra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059042021-31-05-2023

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act 2016 does not provide a mechanism for adjudicating commercial arrangements such as assured returns or Pre-EMI subvention schemes, which are considered independent commercial agreements between parties.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059042021-20-07-2022

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's vakalatnama, directed the conversion of the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 10.08.2022.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059042021-16-05-2022

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections due to non-compliance with previous orders and directed that the matter proceed ex-parte against the respondent.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126059042021-11-10-2022

The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application to recall the order closing their opportunity to file objections, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000/-, and directed both parties to upload their pleadings to the portal within one week.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for mahaluxmi infrahome private ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →