up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126058872021

Appellant / Complainant

Babita Singh

VS

Respondent

Landcraft Developers Pvt. Ltd

Developer Firm

landcraft developers pvt. ltd

Disputed Amount

32,92,921

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & Quality

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

21 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126058872021 by Babita Singh against Landcraft Developers Pvt. Ltd before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestStructural Defects & Quality
2
Stage 123/08/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 32,92,921/- to the appellant along with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the date of refund.

3
Stage 218/08/2023

Hearing

The appellant is challenging the Regulatory Authority's order which directed the respondent to provide possession and pay interest, instead seeking a full refund due to project delays and discrepancies. The Tribunal has heard arguments from both parties regarding the validity of the refund claim versus the offer of possession.

4
Stage 321/07/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 18.08.2023 following an unreasoned request for adjournment by the appellant's counsel and directed parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

5
Stage 410/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 529/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on personal grounds and rescheduled the case for hearing/orders on 10.05.2023.

7
Stage 620/02/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to produce any execution application filed by the appellant and directed the appellant to file an affidavit clarifying that no such execution proceedings have been initiated.

8
Stage 718/01/2023

Hearing

No text available.

9
Stage 813/12/2022

Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 918/11/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned the 449-day delay in filing the appeal by applying the Supreme Court's extension of limitation period during the COVID-19 pandemic and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.

11
Stage 1010/11/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed both parties to file physical copies of their respective objections and replies within one week and scheduled the matter for hearing on 18.11.2022.

12
Stage 1130/09/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel was unprepared and scheduled the case for 10.11.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.

13
Stage 1230/08/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 30.09.2022 for the disposal of a delay condonation application and directed parties to appear on the fixed date.

14
Stage 1302/08/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 30.08.2022 to allow for the appearance of the appellant's counsel and for the disposal of a delay condonation application.

15
Stage 1419/07/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the applicant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the respondent, rescheduling the matter for August 2, 2022.

16
Stage 1525/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional 10 days to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent hearing scheduled for July 19, 2022.

17
Stage 1602/05/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, and directed counsel to register on the e-portal.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126058872021-23-08-2023

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 32,92,921/- to the appellant along with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the date of refund.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126058872021-18-08-2023

The appellant is challenging the Regulatory Authority's order which directed the respondent to provide possession and pay interest, instead seeking a full refund due to project delays and discrepancies. The Tribunal has heard arguments from both parties regarding the validity of the refund claim versus the offer of possession.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126058872021-18-11-2022

The Tribunal condoned the 449-day delay in filing the appeal by applying the Supreme Court's extension of limitation period during the COVID-19 pandemic and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 32,92,921/- to the appellant along with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the date of refund. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 32,92,921/- to the appellant along with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the date of refund.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

from the date of deposit till the refund of the amount

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 14(3)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Shailendra Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Vikas Kumar Verma
  • Ashok Kumar Mishra
  • Utkarsh Kumar

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126058872021-23-08-2023

The Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund Rs. 32,92,921/- to the appellant along with interest at the rate of MCLR+1% per annum from the date of deposit until the date of refund.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126058872021-18-08-2023

The appellant is challenging the Regulatory Authority's order which directed the respondent to provide possession and pay interest, instead seeking a full refund due to project delays and discrepancies. The Tribunal has heard arguments from both parties regarding the validity of the refund claim versus the offer of possession.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126058872021-18-11-2022

The Tribunal condoned the 449-day delay in filing the appeal by applying the Supreme Court's extension of limitation period during the COVID-19 pandemic and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a Regular Appeal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for landcraft developers pvt. ltd?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →