up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126058052021

Appellant / Complainant

Lucknow Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Sanjay Kumar Tiwari

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

24 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126058052021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Sanjay Kumar Tiwari before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 111/03/2025

For Order

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but independently ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.10.2012 to 18.03.2019 (excluding a specific interim period).

3
Stage 210/02/2025

For Order

The appeal has been adjourned at the request of the respondent's counsel and is scheduled to be listed on 11.03.2025.

4
Stage 329/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal has granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 10.02.2025.

5
Stage 421/04/2023

Hearing

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation.

6
Stage 515/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the respondent. The case is scheduled for hearing on 21.04.2023 alongside a related appeal.

7
Stage 616/02/2023

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal adjourned the matter due to the absence of counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 15.03.2023, along with the cross-appeal.

8
Stage 716/01/2023

Exchange of pleadings

No text available.

9
Stage 809/12/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 16.01.2023.

10
Stage 915/11/2022

Exchange of pleadings

No text available.

11
Stage 1017/10/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal has scheduled the case for further orders on 15.11.2022, to be heard alongside cross appeal No. 186/2021.

12
Stage 1113/09/2022

Exchange of pleadings

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the matter for further orders on 17.10.2022, alongside cross Appeal No. 186/2021.

13
Stage 1212/09/2022

Exchange of pleadings

No text available.

14
Stage 1311/08/2022

Further Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to file a Vakalatnama and a reply to the memo of appeal before the next hearing date on 13.09.2022.

15
Stage 1404/07/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final two-week opportunity to file a reply to the appeal and directed that a copy be sent to the appellant's counsel via email.

16
Stage 1526/04/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent an extension of time to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for July 4, 2022.

17
Stage 1615/03/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal condoned a 262-day delay in filing the appeal by applying the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation granted by the Supreme Court and directed the registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.

18
Stage 1721/02/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent following the appellant's deposit of Rs. 3,83,915/- in compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and scheduled the next hearing for 15.03.2022.

19
Stage 1811/01/2022

Compliance of section 43(5)

No text available.

20
Stage 1909/12/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to the appellant to comply with the provisions of Section 43(5) of the Act and listed the defective appeal for further orders on 11.01.2022.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126058052021-15-03-2022

The Tribunal condoned a 262-day delay in filing the appeal by applying the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation granted by the Supreme Court and directed the registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.

22
Stage 21Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126058052021-11-03-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but independently ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.10.2012 to 18.03.2019 (excluding a specific interim period).

23
Stage 22Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126058052021-21-04-2023

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but independently ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.10.2012 to 18.03.2019 (excluding a specific interim period). The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1 percent per annum.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1 percent per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but independently ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.10.2012 to 18.03.2019 (excluding a specific interim period). The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1 percent per annum

Interest Period

w.e.f. 20.10.2012 to 18.03.2019 (excluding 27.04.2013 to 26.10.2016)

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Anju Awasthy

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Shishir Srivastava

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126058052021-15-03-2022

The Tribunal condoned a 262-day delay in filing the appeal by applying the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation granted by the Supreme Court and directed the registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126058052021-11-03-2025

The Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but independently ruled that the respondent is entitled to delay interest at MCLR+1% per annum for the period from 20.10.2012 to 18.03.2019 (excluding a specific interim period).

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126058052021-21-04-2023

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority for want of prosecution due to the absence of legal representation.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →