Appellant / Complainant
Syed Mohd Nabeel
Respondent
Wing Constructions & Developers Private Limited
wing constructions & developers private limited
Unknown
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126057802021 by Syed Mohd Nabeel against Wing Constructions & Developers Private Limited before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal disposed of the defective appeal as infructuous, noting that since the NCLT proceedings have concluded, the applicant may approach UP RERA for resumption of their complaint.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on personal grounds and scheduled the next hearing for 10.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the appeal and no request for adjournment was made.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file supporting documents on the e-Portal regarding the project's status under NCLT moratorium and scheduled the matter for further orders on 01.02.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted that the appeal was filed beyond the limitation period and ordered notice to be issued to the respondent, scheduling the matter for January 7, 2022, to decide on the limitation application.
Tribunal Order #0901126057802021-14-03-2022
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the appeal and no request for adjournment was made.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the appeal and no request for adjournment was made. Awarded in favor of Unknown.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the appeal and no request for adjournment was made.
Ruling Awarded To
Unknown
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nitin Srivastava
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Avanish Kumar Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the appeal and no request for adjournment was made.
Need to research all rulings for wing constructions & developers private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.