up_reraStatus: Active
CASE ID: 0901126057222022

Appellant / Complainant

Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Opendar Kishan Pandita, Sunita Pandita

Developer Firm

uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

35 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126057222022 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Opendar Kishan Pandita, Sunita Pandita before up_rera.

2
Stage 117/12/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to withdraw the appeal as the decretal amount has been recovered, and ordered the release of funds deposited under Section 43(5) to the appellant, subject to verification that no execution proceedings are pending.

3
Stage 202/12/2025

Hearing

The appellant informed the tribunal that compliance has been met via sale deed execution and possession delivery; the court granted seven days to file a withdrawal application and scheduled the next hearing for 17.12.2025.

4
Stage 317/11/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 02.12.2025.

5
Stage 428/10/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the conveyance deed has been executed and granted the appellant time to upload the deed and possession certificate, adjourning the matter to 17.11.2025.

6
Stage 517/09/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the appellant to execute the conveyance deed and hand over physical possession of the unit after the appellant undertook to withdraw unjustified financial demands. The Director of the appellant company was also issued a show-cause notice regarding potential penal action for obstructing the execution of a prior judgment.

7
Stage 602/09/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal condoned a 65-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the appellant to submit a computation statement of account for the unit, while noting that possession is subject to the execution of deeds and settlement of accounts.

8
Stage 718/08/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the delay in handing over possession despite partial OC/CC and payment by the respondent, and subsequently adjourned the appeal to 02.09.2025 to allow the appellant to obtain instructions.

9
Stage 824/07/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter to 18.08.2025 to allow for seeking instructions and filing relevant documents.

10
Stage 907/07/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 24.07.2025.

11
Stage 1002/04/2025

Delay condonation

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, and the court directed that the amount deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) be released to the respondent allottee following a report from the Regulatory Authority.

12
Stage 1107/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on April 2, 2025.

13
Stage 1213/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for March 7, 2025.

14
Stage 1313/01/2025

Delay condonation

No text available.

15
Stage 1403/01/2025

Delay condonation

No text available.

16
Stage 1516/12/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings following an adjournment application by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the hearing for January 13, 2025, to consider the application for condonation of delay.

17
Stage 1628/11/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

18
Stage 1723/10/2024

Delay condonation

Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for consideration regarding the application for condonation of delay on 28.11.2024.

19
Stage 1816/09/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

20
Stage 1920/08/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for September 16, 2024.

21
Stage 2019/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to seek instructions from their client and scheduled the defective appeal for further orders or hearing on 20.08.2024.

22
Stage 2119/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the appellant's request for adjournment due to counsel's engagement in High Court and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 20.05.2024.

23
Stage 2214/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for hearing on 19.04.2024 regarding the application for condonation of delay.

24
Stage 2308/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant for filing a reply to objections and adjourned the matter to 14.03.2024 due to the respondent's counsel seeking adjournment on health grounds.

25
Stage 2409/11/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

26
Stage 2525/09/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondents 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for November 9, 2023.

27
Stage 2608/08/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued fresh notice to the respondents regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed specific procedures for service via speed-post and email.

28
Stage 2726/05/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

29
Stage 2817/04/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal acknowledges the appellant's deposit of Rs. 10,49,165/- in compliance with Section 43(5) and issues notice to the respondents for May 26, 2023, while directing specific procedures for service of notice and filing objections regarding the condonation of delay.

30
Stage 29Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057222022-17-09-2025

The Tribunal directed the appellant to execute the conveyance deed and hand over physical possession of the unit after the appellant undertook to withdraw unjustified financial demands. The Director of the appellant company was also issued a show-cause notice regarding potential penal action for obstructing the execution of a prior judgment.

31
Stage 30Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057222022-02-09-2025

The Tribunal condoned a 65-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the appellant to submit a computation statement of account for the unit, while noting that possession is subject to the execution of deeds and settlement of accounts.

32
Stage 31Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057222022-17-04-2023

The Tribunal acknowledges the appellant's deposit of Rs. 10,49,165/- in compliance with Section 43(5) and issues notice to the respondents for May 26, 2023, while directing specific procedures for service of notice and filing objections regarding the condonation of delay.

33
Stage 32Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057222022-17-12-2025

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to withdraw the appeal as the decretal amount has been recovered, and ordered the release of funds deposited under Section 43(5) to the appellant, subject to verification that no execution proceedings are pending.

34
Stage 33Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057222022-02-04-2025

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, and the court directed that the amount deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) be released to the respondent allottee following a report from the Regulatory Authority.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, and the court directed that the amount deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) be released to the respondent allottee following a report from the Regulatory Authority. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Active

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, and the court directed that the amount deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) be released to the respondent allottee following a report from the Regulatory Authority.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Surangama Sharma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Prasoon Kumar Anjor

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057222022-17-09-2025

The Tribunal directed the appellant to execute the conveyance deed and hand over physical possession of the unit after the appellant undertook to withdraw unjustified financial demands. The Director of the appellant company was also issued a show-cause notice regarding potential penal action for obstructing the execution of a prior judgment.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057222022-02-09-2025

The Tribunal condoned a 65-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the appellant to submit a computation statement of account for the unit, while noting that possession is subject to the execution of deeds and settlement of accounts.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057222022-17-04-2023

The Tribunal acknowledges the appellant's deposit of Rs. 10,49,165/- in compliance with Section 43(5) and issues notice to the respondents for May 26, 2023, while directing specific procedures for service of notice and filing objections regarding the condonation of delay.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057222022-17-12-2025

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to withdraw the appeal as the decretal amount has been recovered, and ordered the release of funds deposited under Section 43(5) to the appellant, subject to verification that no execution proceedings are pending.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057222022-02-04-2025

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, and the court directed that the amount deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) be released to the respondent allottee following a report from the Regulatory Authority.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →