up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126057112021

Appellant / Complainant

Lucknow Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Md. Naushad Khan

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

30 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126057112021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Md. Naushad Khan before up_rera.

2
Stage 128/04/2023

Further Hearing

The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representatives.

3
Stage 220/03/2023

Further Order

No text available.

4
Stage 309/02/2023

Further Order

No text available.

5
Stage 405/01/2023

Further Order

No text available.

6
Stage 505/12/2022

Further Order

No text available.

7
Stage 610/11/2022

Further Order

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for hearing on 05.12.2022.

8
Stage 710/10/2022

Further Order

The appeal was adjourned due to the absence of the appellant, with the matter scheduled for further orders on 10.11.2022.

9
Stage 809/09/2022

Further Order

No text available.

10
Stage 910/08/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay regarding a 200-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic period recognized by the Supreme Court, and directed the respondent to file a reply.

11
Stage 1005/08/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of counsel for the applicant (who is on sanctioned leave) and rescheduled the hearing for 10.08.2022.

12
Stage 1104/08/2022

Delay condonation

The proceedings were adjourned because the counsel for the appellant was on sanctioned leave, and the matter was rescheduled for 05.08.2022.

13
Stage 1203/08/2022

Delay condonation

No text available.

14
Stage 1302/08/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a request from both counsels to adjourn the matter to the following day, 03.08.2022, to allow for the uploading and service of the appellant's reply to objections.

15
Stage 1422/07/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for August 2, 2022, to consider an application for condonation of delay.

16
Stage 1501/07/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for July 22, 2022, to consider the application for condonation of delay.

17
Stage 1626/05/2022

Delay condonation

No text available.

18
Stage 1712/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant's counsel to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to illness and scheduled the next hearing for May 26, 2022.

19
Stage 1828/04/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.05.2022 regarding the application for condonation of delay.

20
Stage 1912/04/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the Legal Representatives' Library.

21
Stage 2015/03/2022

Notice

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the applicant to reply.

22
Stage 2121/02/2022

Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act

The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via a deposit of Rs. 6,02,112/- and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.

23
Stage 2211/01/2022

Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act

No text available.

24
Stage 2308/12/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act and directed the counsel to rectify this legal defect before the next hearing date.

25
Stage 24Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057112021-10-08-2022

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay regarding a 200-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic period recognized by the Supreme Court, and directed the respondent to file a reply.

26
Stage 25Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057112021-12-04-2022

The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the Legal Representatives' Library.

27
Stage 26Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057112021-21-02-2022

The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via a deposit of Rs. 6,02,112/- and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.

28
Stage 27Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057112021-28-04-2023

The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representatives.

29
Stage 28Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126057112021-08-12-2021

The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act and directed the counsel to rectify this legal defect before the next hearing date.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representatives. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representatives.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Yogendra Sharma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Rahul Kapoor

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057112021-10-08-2022

The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay regarding a 200-day delay in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic period recognized by the Supreme Court, and directed the respondent to file a reply.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057112021-12-04-2022

The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 500/- to be used for the Legal Representatives' Library.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057112021-21-02-2022

The Tribunal noted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act via a deposit of Rs. 6,02,112/- and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057112021-28-04-2023

The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representatives.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126057112021-08-12-2021

The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act and directed the counsel to rectify this legal defect before the next hearing date.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →