up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126055792022

Appellant / Complainant

Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Dinesh Gulati

Developer Firm

uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

17 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126055792022 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Dinesh Gulati before up_rera.

2
Stage 108/11/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the allottee.

3
Stage 208/08/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an application for the condonation of a 116-day delay in filing the appeal and has reserved its order.

4
Stage 309/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 08.08.2024 following a request from counsel due to the respondent's representative being delayed by traffic.

5
Stage 410/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the defective appeal to 09.07.2024 due to the illness of the appellant's counsel.

6
Stage 509/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the absence of a required affidavit for the condonation of delay and adjourned the matter to 10.05.2024.

7
Stage 606/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on personal grounds and rescheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 09.04.2024.

8
Stage 701/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a better affidavit for the condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 06.03.2024.

9
Stage 802/11/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

10
Stage 920/09/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the respondent. The case is scheduled for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 02.11.2023.

11
Stage 1002/08/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the illness of both counsels and scheduled the matter for hearing on 20.09.2023, directing parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.

12
Stage 1122/05/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent timeline set for the applicant's reply.

13
Stage 1210/04/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 22.05.2023.

14
Stage 1327/02/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed specific procedures for service of notice and exchange of objections/replies via email and e-portal.

15
Stage 14Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126055792022-08-11-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the allottee.

16
Stage 15Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126055792022-27-02-2023

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed specific procedures for service of notice and exchange of objections/replies via email and e-portal.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the allottee. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the allottee.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav
  • Bal Kishor Verma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Prasoon Kumar Anjor
  • Vinay Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126055792022-08-11-2024

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay due to lack of sufficient cause and dismissed the appeal; consequently, it directed that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to the U.P. RERA for disbursement to the allottee.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126055792022-27-02-2023

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed specific procedures for service of notice and exchange of objections/replies via email and e-portal.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →