Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Anklesh Kumar
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126055752022 by Lucknow Development Authority against Anklesh Kumar before up_rera.
For Order
The Tribunal directed that funds deposited by the promoter be transmitted to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent in accordance with law, rather than releasing them directly via the current appeal proceedings.
Delay condonation
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representative.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange electronic copies of the application for condonation of delay and the memo of appeal to facilitate filing objections, with the matter listed for hearing on 05.01.2023.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the applicant three days to rectify unreadable annexures (1, 4, 5, and 6) and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 14.10.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126055752022-29-01-2025
The Tribunal directed that funds deposited by the promoter be transmitted to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent in accordance with law, rather than releasing them directly via the current appeal proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126055752022-28-04-2023
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representative.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal directed that funds deposited by the promoter be transmitted to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent in accordance with law, rather than releasing them directly via the current appeal proceedings. The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representative. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal directed that funds deposited by the promoter be transmitted to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent in accordance with law, rather than releasing them directly via the current appeal proceedings. The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representative.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Yogendra Sharma
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal directed that funds deposited by the promoter be transmitted to the Regulatory Authority for disbursement to the respondent in accordance with law, rather than releasing them directly via the current appeal proceedings.
The appeal filed by the Lucknow Development Authority was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of its representative.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.