up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126054872022

Appellant / Complainant

Chandra Pratap Singh, Reena Chauhan

VS

Respondent

Up Awas N Vikas Parishad

Disputed Amount

1,50,000

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional Misrepresentation

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

22 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126054872022 by Chandra Pratap Singh, Reena Chauhan against Up Awas N Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestPromotional Misrepresentation
2
Stage 117/01/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for mental agony while clarifying that jurisdiction for delay interest lies with the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer.

3
Stage 218/10/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both the appellant and respondent and has reserved its judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 320/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to study a cited judgment and adjourned the matter to 18.10.2024 for further orders/hearing.

5
Stage 420/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on personal grounds and scheduled the matter for hearing on 20.09.2024, noting that no further extensions will be granted.

6
Stage 518/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for August 20, 2024.

7
Stage 617/05/2024

Hearing

No text available.

8
Stage 718/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the illness of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 17.05.2024.

9
Stage 813/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel is on leave and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 18.04.2024.

10
Stage 909/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel due to sanctioned leave and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 13.03.2024.

11
Stage 1009/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

12
Stage 1129/08/2023

Hearing

No text available.

13
Stage 1211/07/2023

Hearing

No text available.

14
Stage 1301/05/2023

Hearing

No text available.

15
Stage 1421/03/2023

For Order

No text available.

16
Stage 1513/02/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the appellant's counsel and provided 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections, with the next hearing scheduled for 21.03.2023.

17
Stage 1611/01/2023

For Order

No text available.

18
Stage 1708/12/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the appellant to file a reply. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 11.01.2023.

19
Stage 1814/11/2022

For Order

No text available.

20
Stage 1910/10/2022

Admission

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural requirements for service of the appeal and subsequent exchange of objections and replies.

21
Stage 20Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126054872022-17-01-2025

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for mental agony while clarifying that jurisdiction for delay interest lies with the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for mental agony while clarifying that jurisdiction for delay interest lies with the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for mental agony while clarifying that jurisdiction for delay interest lies with the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 12

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Mohd Zafar Khan
  • Mohd Imran Khan

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126054872022-17-01-2025

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, upholding the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for mental agony while clarifying that jurisdiction for delay interest lies with the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →