Appellant / Complainant
Anjani
Respondent
Up Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
₹1,50,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126054842022 by Anjani against Up Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, ruling that while the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for harassment was reasonable, the claim for delay interest must be filed before the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both the appellant and respondent, after which the judgment was reserved.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to study a cited judgment and adjourned the matter to 18.10.2024 for further orders/hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on personal grounds and scheduled the matter for hearing on 20.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for August 20, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the illness of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 17.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel due to sanctioned leave and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 18.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel due to sanctioned leave and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 13.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the respondent, scheduling the next hearing for 21.03.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the delay condonation application and grounds of appeal, with subsequent timelines set for replies and e-portal uploads.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for service of appeal documents, filing of objections, and subsequent replies before the next hearing on 14.11.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126054842022-17-01-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, ruling that while the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for harassment was reasonable, the claim for delay interest must be filed before the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, ruling that while the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for harassment was reasonable, the claim for delay interest must be filed before the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, ruling that while the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for harassment was reasonable, the claim for delay interest must be filed before the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Mohd Imran Khan
Respondent Advocate(s)
- N N Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals seeking enhanced compensation and delay penalties, ruling that while the Adjudicating Officer's award of Rs. 1,00,000 for harassment was reasonable, the claim for delay interest must be filed before the RERA Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.