Appellant / Complainant
Tribhuwan Yadav
Respondent
Prayagraj Development Authority
₹17,10,257
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126054102023 by Tribhuwan Yadav against Prayagraj Development Authority before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that an allottee who chooses to continue in a delayed project is entitled to interest for the delay but is not entitled to compensation under the proviso to Section 18(1) of the Act, 2016.
Admission
The Appellant was granted time to file a rejoinder affidavit to the respondent's objections, and the defective appeal has been listed for hearing on 18.12.2024.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week's time to file an objection and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on November 22, 2024.
Admission
The Tribunal confirmed sufficient service of notice on the respondent and granted them ten days to file objections, with the case scheduled for hearing on 18.10.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural steps for service of notice and filing objections regarding the application for condonation of delay, scheduling the next hearing for 05.09.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 05.08.2024 along with the office report.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings in Appeal-249/2024 due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for orders on 26.07.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126054102023-18-12-2024
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that an allottee who chooses to continue in a delayed project is entitled to interest for the delay but is not entitled to compensation under the proviso to Section 18(1) of the Act, 2016.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that an allottee who chooses to continue in a delayed project is entitled to interest for the delay but is not entitled to compensation under the proviso to Section 18(1) of the Act, 2016. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that an allottee who chooses to continue in a delayed project is entitled to interest for the delay but is not entitled to compensation under the proviso to Section 18(1) of the Act, 2016.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Neeraj Pandey
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anupam Dwivedi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that an allottee who chooses to continue in a delayed project is entitled to interest for the delay but is not entitled to compensation under the proviso to Section 18(1) of the Act, 2016.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.