up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126053232022

Appellant / Complainant

Divye Kumar Trivedi

VS

Respondent

Supertech Limited

Developer Firm

supertech limited

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

7 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126053232022 by Divye Kumar Trivedi against Supertech Limited before up_rera.

2
Stage 110/01/2023

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal ruled that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC remains applicable to Supertech Limited as a whole, despite NCLAT's direction to treat certain projects as ongoing, and ordered the current proceedings to be kept in abeyance.

3
Stage 220/10/2022

For Order

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the status of the respondent's moratorium following an NCLAT order and reserved its judgment on the application for urgent listing.

4
Stage 322/09/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to place on record the latest status of proceedings before the NCLT and adjourned the matter to October 20, 2022.

5
Stage 412/09/2022

For Order

The Tribunal has scheduled the application for urgent listing (IA-3369/2022) for consideration on 22.09.2022 due to the absence of the respondent's counsel.

6
Stage 5Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126053232022-10-01-2023

The Tribunal ruled that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC remains applicable to Supertech Limited as a whole, despite NCLAT's direction to treat certain projects as ongoing, and ordered the current proceedings to be kept in abeyance.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal ruled that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC remains applicable to Supertech Limited as a whole, despite NCLAT's direction to treat certain projects as ongoing, and ordered the current proceedings to be kept in abeyance. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal ruled that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC remains applicable to Supertech Limited as a whole, despite NCLAT's direction to treat certain projects as ongoing, and ordered the current proceedings to be kept in abeyance.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126053232022-10-01-2023

The Tribunal ruled that the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC remains applicable to Supertech Limited as a whole, despite NCLAT's direction to treat certain projects as ongoing, and ordered the current proceedings to be kept in abeyance.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for supertech limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →