up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126053062022

Appellant / Complainant

Gulshan Homz Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Sushant Arora

Developer Firm

gulshan homz private limited

Disputed Amount

55,44,332

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

20 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126053062022 by Gulshan Homz Private Limited against Sushant Arora before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestNon-Compliance & ExecutionJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 126/09/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to grant compensation in the form of interest for delay when an allottee chooses to stay in a project rather than withdraw; instead, such interest should be determined by the Regulatory Authority.

3
Stage 209/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding the appeal and subsequently reserved its judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 310/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 09.07.2024, while extending any existing interim relief until the next listing date.

5
Stage 424/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to his absence from the station and rescheduled the hearing for 10.05.2024.

6
Stage 519/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from both parties to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-654/2022 to 24.04.2024, while maintaining any existing interim orders until that date.

7
Stage 605/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the hearing of Appeal-654/2022 to 19.03.2024 upon a joint request from both parties and extended any existing interim orders until the next hearing date.

8
Stage 707/02/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings upon a joint request from both parties and scheduled the next hearing for March 5, 2024, while maintaining the existing interim order.

9
Stage 808/11/2023

Hearing

No text available.

10
Stage 925/09/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 08.11.2023 following a joint request from both parties and extended any existing interim orders until the next hearing date.

11
Stage 1009/08/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 25.09.2023 for a hearing and ordered that any existing interim orders shall continue until the next listing date.

12
Stage 1129/05/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for August 9, 2023, while maintaining any existing interim orders.

13
Stage 1219/04/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for May 29, 2023, while maintaining any existing interim orders.

14
Stage 1303/03/2023

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal following the High Court's condonation of delay, and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections.

15
Stage 1422/09/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, subsequently directing that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent during execution proceedings.

16
Stage 1508/09/2022

Defect Removal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to serve summons via dasti process.

17
Stage 16Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126053062022-26-09-2024

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to grant compensation in the form of interest for delay when an allottee chooses to stay in a project rather than withdraw; instead, such interest should be determined by the Regulatory Authority.

18
Stage 17Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126053062022-22-09-2022

The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, subsequently directing that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent during execution proceedings.

19
Stage 18Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126053062022-03-03-2023

The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal following the High Court's condonation of delay, and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to grant compensation in the form of interest for delay when an allottee chooses to stay in a project rather than withdraw; instead, such interest should be determined by the Regulatory Authority. The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, subsequently directing that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent during execution proceedings. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: SBI's MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: SBI's MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to grant compensation in the form of interest for delay when an allottee chooses to stay in a project rather than withdraw; instead, such interest should be determined by the Regulatory Authority. The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, subsequently directing that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent during execution proceedings.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

SBI's MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

from 01.07.2019 to 12.10.2020

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 40Section 63Section 64Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Aahuti Agarwal
  • Manoj Kumar

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126053062022-26-09-2024

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order, ruling that the officer lacked jurisdiction to grant compensation in the form of interest for delay when an allottee chooses to stay in a project rather than withdraw; instead, such interest should be determined by the Regulatory Authority.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126053062022-22-09-2022

The Tribunal rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, subsequently directing that the pre-deposited amount under Section 43(5) be transferred to U.P. RERA for disbursement to the respondent during execution proceedings.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126053062022-03-03-2023

The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal following the High Court's condonation of delay, and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for gulshan homz private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →