Appellant / Complainant
Lucknow Development Authority
Respondent
Vinay Kumar Gupta, Seema Melhotra
Unknown
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126052612021 by Lucknow Development Authority against Vinay Kumar Gupta, Seema Melhotra before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
This is a procedural order directing the reader to refer to a separate order passed in Appeal No. 591/2021 for the substantive directions.
Further Order
The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsel for both the Lucknow Development Authority and the respondents, after which the judgment was reserved.
Further Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 12.12.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed before Bench No. 1 on 16.11.2022 to maintain consistency with a similar disposed case.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent to appear at the next hearing and scheduled the appeal for 18.10.2022 to be heard alongside cross Appeal No. 591/2021.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 14.09.2022 for a joint hearing alongside Cross Appeal No. 591/2021 at the request of the counsels.
Hearing
The Tribunal ordered the case to be listed along with Cross Appeal No. 591/2021 on 16.08.2021 for further orders.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the absence of counsel for the appellant and scheduled the next hearing for August 10, 2022.
Hearing
The proceedings for Appeal-914/2021 were adjourned because the counsel for the appellant was on sanctioned leave; the matter is scheduled to be listed on 05.08.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for August 2, 2022, to consider the application for condonation of delay.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 22.07.2022.
to file objections and its reply
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant for filing a reply to the respondents' objections due to counsel's illness and scheduled the next hearing for 26.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent hearing scheduled for 26.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondents two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, scheduling the next hearing for April 8, 2022.
Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents regarding an application for condonation of delay after the appellant demonstrated compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the remaining 70% of the required amount.
Rest deposit Amount under 43(5) of the Act
No text available.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act and directed them to rectify this defect before the next hearing on 11.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126052612021-26-04-2022
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126052612021-21-02-2022
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents regarding an application for condonation of delay after the appellant demonstrated compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the remaining 70% of the required amount.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Unknown Awarded in favor of Unknown.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Unknown
Ruling Awarded To
Unknown
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Yogendra Sharma
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Mohd. Zafar Khan
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal allowed the application for condonation of delay, citing the Supreme Court's Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents regarding an application for condonation of delay after the appellant demonstrated compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the remaining 70% of the required amount.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.