Appellant / Complainant
Sant Ram
Respondent
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
₹37,44,676
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126052532022 by Sant Ram against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for interest due to delay in possession are maintainable before the Regulatory Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer, while granting allottees liberty to approach the Authority for such relief.
For Order
The appellant is challenging an order by the Adjudicating Officer, seeking various compensations for delay in possession, incorrect information, and financial losses; however, the tribunal has reserved its judgment following arguments regarding the admissibility of new evidence during the appeal.
For Order
The Tribunal directed that orders for this appeal be seen in the order passed in Appeal No. 650/2022 and scheduled the next hearing date for 22.08.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 18.07.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for May 5, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of counsel and granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections, scheduling the next hearing for 27.03.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder to the respondent's reply and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 16.01.2023.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for November 15, 2022.
Admission
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural steps for service of notice and the exchange of objections and replies between the parties.
Tribunal Order #0901126052532022-14-09-2023
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for interest due to delay in possession are maintainable before the Regulatory Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer, while granting allottees liberty to approach the Authority for such relief.
Tribunal Order #0901126052532022-22-08-2023
The appellant is challenging an order by the Adjudicating Officer, seeking various compensations for delay in possession, incorrect information, and financial losses; however, the tribunal has reserved its judgment following arguments regarding the admissibility of new evidence during the appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for interest due to delay in possession are maintainable before the Regulatory Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer, while granting allottees liberty to approach the Authority for such relief. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for interest due to delay in possession are maintainable before the Regulatory Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer, while granting allottees liberty to approach the Authority for such relief.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Kaviya Singh
- Rishindra Vikram Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- N N Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, ruling that claims for interest due to delay in possession are maintainable before the Regulatory Authority rather than the Adjudicating Officer, while granting allottees liberty to approach the Authority for such relief.
The appellant is challenging an order by the Adjudicating Officer, seeking various compensations for delay in possession, incorrect information, and financial losses; however, the tribunal has reserved its judgment following arguments regarding the admissibility of new evidence during the appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.