Appellant / Complainant
Renowned Buildtech Private Limited
Respondent
Rama Sharma, Sudhir Pathak
renowned buildtech private limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126052282022 by Renowned Buildtech Private Limited against Rama Sharma, Sudhir Pathak before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, with a directive to transfer the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the Regulatory Authority for disposal during execution proceedings.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant promoter to hand over physical possession of the unit in habitable condition within eight weeks, provided the respondent deposits Rs. 5 lakh, while reserving the final determination of remaining charges pending the appeal outcome.
Hearing
The Tribunal listed the case for orders on 08.05.2025 and noted that no further adjournments will be granted to either party.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the application for condonation of delay and a subsequent hearing on 11.04.2025, following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 08.04.2025.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for orders/hearing on 11.03.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant additional time to deposit the prescribed cost and scheduled the next hearing for February 13, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the counsel for the appellant and scheduled the appeal for orders on 29.01.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a 68-day delay in filing the appeal by Renowned Buildtech Private Limited, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000, due to the authorized representative contracting COVID-19.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled a defective appeal for consideration regarding an application for condonation of delay on 04-12-2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the failure of the settlement process and adjourned the appeal to 04.11.2024, directing the appellant to ensure representation for arguments on the next date.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and adjourned the appeal to 24.09.2024 for orders or hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that parties are attempting an amicable settlement and directed them to report any progress at the next hearing, which is scheduled for 21.08.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 22.07.2024 to allow the parties an opportunity to pursue an amicable settlement.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a family marriage ceremony and rescheduled the hearing for 22.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay for 22.04.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 15.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant's counsel to prepare the brief and scheduled the hearing for the defective appeal and the application for condonation of delay on 13.02.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the applicant's counsel due to medical reasons and noted that the appeal is currently defective but ready for hearing as pleadings have been exchanged.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has scheduled the defective appeal for 31.03.2023 to consider an application for condonation of delay and for further hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's reply contained registry defects to be rectified within a week and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 28.02.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondents' objections and to serve soft copies to the respondents, scheduling the matter for orders on 13.02.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel five days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the case for hearing on 10.01.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the electronic service of said reply, scheduling the matter for hearing on 07.12.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on 11.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents regarding the appellant's application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to follow specific service and filing procedures before the next hearing on 30.09.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126052282022-08-07-2025
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, with a directive to transfer the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the Regulatory Authority for disposal during execution proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126052282022-08-05-2025
The Tribunal directed the appellant promoter to hand over physical possession of the unit in habitable condition within eight weeks, provided the respondent deposits Rs. 5 lakh, while reserving the final determination of remaining charges pending the appeal outcome.
Tribunal Order #0901126052282022-04-12-2024
The Tribunal condoned a 68-day delay in filing the appeal by Renowned Buildtech Private Limited, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000, due to the authorized representative contracting COVID-19.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, with a directive to transfer the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the Regulatory Authority for disposal during execution proceedings. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, with a directive to transfer the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the Regulatory Authority for disposal during execution proceedings.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Lohitaksha Shukla
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear, with a directive to transfer the amount deposited under Section 43(5) of the Act to the Regulatory Authority for disposal during execution proceedings.
The Tribunal directed the appellant promoter to hand over physical possession of the unit in habitable condition within eight weeks, provided the respondent deposits Rs. 5 lakh, while reserving the final determination of remaining charges pending the appeal outcome.
The Tribunal condoned a 68-day delay in filing the appeal by Renowned Buildtech Private Limited, subject to a cost of Rs. 5,000, due to the authorized representative contracting COVID-19.
Need to research all rulings for renowned buildtech private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.