Appellant / Complainant
Ravi Pratap Sharma
Respondent
Ajpa Parishad Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd.
ajpa parishad sahkari awas samiti ltd.
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126052172022 by Ravi Pratap Sharma against Ajpa Parishad Sahkari Awas Samiti Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the lower authority's order by enhancing compensation for missing amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in promised super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the respondent refused to accept the notice, deemed service sufficient, and reserved the judgment for further consideration.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the Registry to issue dasti notice to the appellant and scheduled the matter for hearing on 12.12.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence from the station and rescheduled the matter for orders on 18.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal refers to a previous order passed in a related appeal and lists the current appeal for a hearing on 03.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a seven-day extension to comply with the previous order dated 08.08.2024 and scheduled the next hearing for 02.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's inability to identify current office bearers due to a dissolved committee and warned that the President and Secretary may face proceedings under Section 64 of the Act for non-compliance with previous orders. The matter is listed for 21.08.2024, with the appellant granted one week to provide details of the respondent's office bearers.
Hearing
The order provides a procedural reference, directing the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. 668/2022 for the relevant directions.
Further Hearing
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to the order previously passed in Appeal No. 80/2023.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for an extension of time due to procedural defects and ordered the summoning of the respondent's President and Secretary to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against them for non-compliance under Section 64 of the Act, 2016.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify the actual super area being offered to the appellant following an IIT Roorkee report showing a discrepancy in area, and to specify whether the conveyance deed will cover super area or carpet area.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment but issued a strict warning that no further adjournments will be permitted on the next hearing date, noting the statutory mandate to dispose of appeals within 60 days.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the hearing of the appeal to 21.03.2024 following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for March 6, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 16.02.2024 due to the appellant's counsel being on sanctioned leave.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 13.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request due to the counsel's ill health and directed the parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing scheduled for 05.09.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file a reply to the appellant's supplementary affidavit and scheduled the matter for hearing on 24.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ready for hearing and, upon a joint request from the counsel for both parties, adjourned the matter to be heard on 12.04.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for March 1, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the electronic service of said reply, scheduling the next hearing for 31.01.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal directed that this appeal be listed on 21.12.2022 along with Appeal No. 680/2022, referencing a previous order dated 25.11.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the appeal, while issuing a warning regarding their failure to comply with previous procedural timelines.
Admission
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for the service of the appeal memo and the filing of objections and replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126052172022-14-05-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the lower authority's order by enhancing compensation for missing amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in promised super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report.
Tribunal Order #0901126052172022-07-05-2024
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for an extension of time due to procedural defects and ordered the summoning of the respondent's President and Secretary to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against them for non-compliance under Section 64 of the Act, 2016.
Tribunal Order #0901126052172022-08-08-2024
The Tribunal noted the respondent's inability to identify current office bearers due to a dissolved committee and warned that the President and Secretary may face proceedings under Section 64 of the Act for non-compliance with previous orders. The matter is listed for 21.08.2024, with the appellant granted one week to provide details of the respondent's office bearers.
Tribunal Order #0901126052172022-15-04-2024
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify the actual super area being offered to the appellant following an IIT Roorkee report showing a discrepancy in area, and to specify whether the conveyance deed will cover super area or carpet area.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the lower authority's order by enhancing compensation for missing amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in promised super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the lower authority's order by enhancing compensation for missing amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in promised super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
- Aahuti Agarwal
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal modified the lower authority's order by enhancing compensation for missing amenities to Rs. 1,00,000 and awarding specific compensation to nine appellants for the shortfall in promised super area based on an IIT Roorkee inspection report.
The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for an extension of time due to procedural defects and ordered the summoning of the respondent's President and Secretary to show cause why proceedings should not be initiated against them for non-compliance under Section 64 of the Act, 2016.
The Tribunal noted the respondent's inability to identify current office bearers due to a dissolved committee and warned that the President and Secretary may face proceedings under Section 64 of the Act for non-compliance with previous orders. The matter is listed for 21.08.2024, with the appellant granted one week to provide details of the respondent's office bearers.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to clarify the actual super area being offered to the appellant following an IIT Roorkee report showing a discrepancy in area, and to specify whether the conveyance deed will cover super area or carpet area.
Need to research all rulings for ajpa parishad sahkari awas samiti ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.