Appellant / Complainant
Dina Nath Baghel, Sanjay Singh Baghel
Respondent
Amit Kumar Lohani, Malook Nagar, Bhabhuti Singh Awana, Sudha Nagar, Aims Golf Town Developers Private Limited
aims golf town developers private limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126051872022 by Dina Nath Baghel, Sanjay Singh Baghel against Amit Kumar Lohani, Malook Nagar, Bhabhuti Singh Awana, Sudha Nagar, Aims Golf Town Developers Private Limited before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal closed the appellant's opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections due to failure to comply with previous timelines and scheduled the matter for hearing on 05.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on October 27, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to a personal bereavement and rescheduled the case for hearing/orders on 27.07.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the respondent's undertaking to file objections and replies within a week and scheduled the matter for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 06.04.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and their vakalatnama, with a subsequent hearing scheduled for January 25, 2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 16.12.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to serve the notice and appeal documents via speed-post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126051872022-05-03-2024
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Pawan Kumar Ray
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Harish Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant and no request for adjournment.
Need to research all rulings for aims golf town developers private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.