up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126051822023

Appellant / Complainant

Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.

VS

Respondent

Kashi Nath Singh

Developer Firm

uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

13 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126051822023 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Kashi Nath Singh before up_rera.

2
Stage 102/12/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 93-day delay was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

3
Stage 201/10/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an application for condonation of delay and reserved its judgment on the matter.

4
Stage 302/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment following an application by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 01.10.2024.

5
Stage 431/07/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

6
Stage 501/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the counsel for the applicant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 31.07.2024.

7
Stage 601/05/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

8
Stage 729/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week extension to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and directed the respondent's counsel to register on the portal for future cause list visibility.

9
Stage 823/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the appellant's counsel being out of station and directed the respondent to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal within 10 days.

10
Stage 916/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal provisionally accepted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act following a deposit of Rs. 10,73,521 and issued notice to the respondent to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.

11
Stage 10Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126051822023-16-01-2024

The Tribunal provisionally accepted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act following a deposit of Rs. 10,73,521 and issued notice to the respondent to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.

12
Stage 11Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126051822023-02-12-2024

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 93-day delay was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 93-day delay was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 93-day delay was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Naveen Kumar Tiwari

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126051822023-16-01-2024

The Tribunal provisionally accepted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act following a deposit of Rs. 10,73,521 and issued notice to the respondent to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126051822023-02-12-2024

The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and subsequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 93-day delay was willful and lacked a satisfactory explanation.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →