Appellant / Complainant
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Harvir Singh, Vikas Yadav
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126051812023 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Harvir Singh, Vikas Yadav before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 240-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the application for condonation of delay and reserved its judgment on the matter.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final three-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 01.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and directed the respondent's counsel to register on the portal for cause list visibility. The matter is scheduled for orders on 31.07.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on May 1, 2024, regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal deemed the service of notice to the respondent sufficient and granted a 10-day extension for filing objections, scheduling the next hearing for March 29, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal provisionally accepted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act following a deposit of Rs. 15,02,886 and issued notice to the respondents to seek objections regarding the condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126051812023-02-12-2024
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 240-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation.
Tribunal Order #0901126051812023-16-01-2024
The Tribunal provisionally accepted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act following a deposit of Rs. 15,02,886 and issued notice to the respondents to seek objections regarding the condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 240-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 240-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Naveen Kumar Tiwari
- Sunamika
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Prasoon Kumar Anjor
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay and consequently dismissed the appeal, finding that the 240-day delay in instituting the appeal was willful and lacked satisfactory explanation.
The Tribunal provisionally accepted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act following a deposit of Rs. 15,02,886 and issued notice to the respondents to seek objections regarding the condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.