up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126051102022

Appellant / Complainant

Park Town Complex Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Sanjay Kumar

Developer Firm

park town complex private limited

Disputed Amount

6,93,015

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title Transfer

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

36 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126051102022 by Park Town Complex Private Limited against Sanjay Kumar before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title Transfer
2
Stage 127/02/2026

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order directing a refund to the allottee, ruling that the original decision was passed in violation of natural justice due to technical glitches preventing the developer's reply from being visible on the portal. The complaint is restored and remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits after providing both parties adequate opportunity to present their case.

3
Stage 202/12/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels regarding Appeal-617/2022 and has reserved the judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 315/11/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on December 2, 2025.

5
Stage 405/09/2025

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 522/08/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 05.09.2025 for final hearing and issued a strict directive that no further adjournments will be granted.

7
Stage 607/08/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant time to seek instructions regarding allegations that their Occupancy Certificate (OC/CC) is a procured document and adjourned the matter to 22.08.2025.

8
Stage 721/07/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the filing of a clarification by the appellant-promoter and directed the respondent to file objections to said clarification, listing the matter for further hearing on 07.08.2025.

9
Stage 810/07/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on 21.07.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.

10
Stage 916/05/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 10.07.2025 to allow the appellant counsel to seek instructions regarding whether a final Occupancy Certificate/Completion Certificate has been received.

11
Stage 1023/04/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 16.05.2025.

12
Stage 1120/02/2025

For Order

The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant's counsel during the hearing.

13
Stage 1230/01/2025

For Order

The court granted a request from the respondent's counsel to adjourn the matter and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 20.02.2025.

14
Stage 1315/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal has granted a request from the parties to list the appeal on 30.01.2025.

15
Stage 1427/08/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels regarding Appeal-617/2022 and has reserved the judgment for a later date.

16
Stage 1525/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal engagement and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 27.08.2024.

17
Stage 1604/07/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel two weeks to inspect the records received from the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority and scheduled the next hearing for 25.07.2024.

18
Stage 1706/05/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal difficulty and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.07.2024.

19
Stage 1804/04/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal has ordered the summoning of the original records for Complaint No. NCR 145/07/77826/2021 from the UP RERA Secretary to address discrepancies regarding filed replies and amendments in the respondent's prayer.

20
Stage 1901/03/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for April 4, 2024.

21
Stage 2022/01/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the applicant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on March 1, 2024.

22
Stage 2118/10/2023

Hearing

No text available.

23
Stage 2212/09/2023

Hearing

No text available.

24
Stage 2321/07/2023

Hearing

This document is a formal header/caption of an order from the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dated 21.07.2023 regarding Appeal-617/2022 between Parktown Complex Private Limited and Sanjay Kumar; however, it contains no substantive rulings or directives.

25
Stage 2413/07/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for July 21, 2023.

26
Stage 2502/05/2023

For Order

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the appellant to file a reply within one week thereafter, scheduling the next hearing for July 13, 2023.

27
Stage 2621/03/2023

For Order

No text available.

28
Stage 2710/02/2023

For Order

No text available.

29
Stage 2806/01/2023

For Order

No text available.

30
Stage 2906/12/2022

For Order

No text available.

31
Stage 3010/11/2022

For Order

The Tribunal granted a final 10-day extension to the respondent's counsel to file objections and vakalatnama, warning that failure to comply will result in ex-parte proceedings.

32
Stage 3129/09/2022

Notice

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the exchange of documents via email before the next hearing on 10.11.2022.

33
Stage 3201/09/2022

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding Appeal-617/2022 and directed the appellant to serve the notice via speed-post and email, scheduling the next hearing for 29.09.2022.

34
Stage 33Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126051102022-27-02-2026

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order directing a refund to the allottee, ruling that the original decision was passed in violation of natural justice due to technical glitches preventing the developer's reply from being visible on the portal. The complaint is restored and remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits after providing both parties adequate opportunity to present their case.

35
Stage 34Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126051102022-04-04-2024

The Tribunal has ordered the summoning of the original records for Complaint No. NCR 145/07/77826/2021 from the UP RERA Secretary to address discrepancies regarding filed replies and amendments in the respondent's prayer.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order directing a refund to the allottee, ruling that the original decision was passed in violation of natural justice due to technical glitches preventing the developer's reply from being visible on the portal. The complaint is restored and remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits after providing both parties adequate opportunity to present their case. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order directing a refund to the allottee, ruling that the original decision was passed in violation of natural justice due to technical glitches preventing the developer's reply from being visible on the portal. The complaint is restored and remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits after providing both parties adequate opportunity to present their case.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Kshemendra Shukla
  • Arun Kumar Roy

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Suchita Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126051102022-27-02-2026

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the UPRERA order directing a refund to the allottee, ruling that the original decision was passed in violation of natural justice due to technical glitches preventing the developer's reply from being visible on the portal. The complaint is restored and remanded to the Regulatory Authority for a fresh decision on merits after providing both parties adequate opportunity to present their case.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126051102022-04-04-2024

The Tribunal has ordered the summoning of the original records for Complaint No. NCR 145/07/77826/2021 from the UP RERA Secretary to address discrepancies regarding filed replies and amendments in the respondent's prayer.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for park town complex private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →