Appellant / Complainant
Jai Prakash Singh
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
₹28,08,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126050482021 by Jai Prakash Singh against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the complaint was not maintainable because the project was not an 'ongoing project' under the Act and the claim was barred by an inordinate delay.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for hearing/order on 29.10.2025 before Bench No. 1, noting that the matter is part-heard.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to comply with the order dated 28.08.2025 and previous orders, and scheduled the next hearing for 15.10.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent to bring on record the OC/CC of the 'Sinder's Dump Scheme' project, clarify the status of the unit/agreement cancellation, and provide the current status of the project before the next hearing.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant's counsel at the hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent additional time to submit orders from the High Court or Supreme Court and scheduled the appeal for a subsequent hearing on 30.07.2025.
Hearing
The court has granted a request from the respondent's counsel to list the case for orders on 22.07.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 07.07.2025.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and scheduled for hearing on 09.05.2025 before Bench No. 2.
For Order
Upon the joint request of both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the hearing of Appeal-936/2021 to 16.04.2025.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the counsel for the appellant was not prepared to argue the matter.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant subject to the payment of a Rs 500 cost for the library and directed the appellant to make alternative arrangements if counsel is unavailable on the next date.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant but imposed a cost of Rs 500/- to be deposited in the Registry before the next hearing date on 16.12.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 13.11.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has rescheduled the appeal for final hearing/orders to 16.10.2024.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the appeal has been listed for a final hearing on 18.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 14.08.2024 for final hearing upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on personal grounds and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 19.07.2024.
Hearing
The appellant's counsel requested an adjournment due to health grounds, and the tribunal rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders to 24.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 25.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to the hospitalization of the arguing counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 03.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel, rescheduling the hearing for March 1, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel requested a hearing by a senior advocate and subsequently listed the appeal for hearing on 06.11.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the matter for orders/hearing on 25.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on February 9, 2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply before the next hearing on 03.11.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and permitted the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for 29.09.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via email and directed them to engage counsel, scheduling the matter for further orders on 30.08.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to serve the memo of appeal to the respondent's panel lawyer and set a timeline for filing objections and replies before the next hearing on 01.08.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court precedents regarding Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Lucknow Development Authority, due to their failure to file objections or appear despite being served notice. The matter is scheduled for an ex parte hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 06.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent is sufficient via email and post, and granted the respondent one week to file objections to the condonation of delay and the appeal, warning that the matter will proceed ex-parte if they fail to respond.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the applicant's co-counsel three days to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the case for hearing on April 4, 2022, regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to remove registry defects and directed the issuance of a fresh notice to the respondent, with the next hearing scheduled for March 22, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted that the appellant failed to remove registry defects and that the appeal was filed beyond the limitation period; consequently, notice was ordered to be issued to the respondent, and the matter was adjourned to 13.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126050482021-16-12-2024
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant subject to the payment of a Rs 500 cost for the library and directed the appellant to make alternative arrangements if counsel is unavailable on the next date.
Tribunal Order #0901126050482021-06-05-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court precedents regarding Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126050482021-20-04-2022
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Lucknow Development Authority, due to their failure to file objections or appear despite being served notice. The matter is scheduled for an ex parte hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 06.05.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126050482021-13-11-2024
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant but imposed a cost of Rs 500/- to be deposited in the Registry before the next hearing date on 16.12.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126050482021-04-04-2022
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent is sufficient via email and post, and granted the respondent one week to file objections to the condonation of delay and the appeal, warning that the matter will proceed ex-parte if they fail to respond.
Tribunal Order #0901126050482021-29-10-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the complaint was not maintainable because the project was not an 'ongoing project' under the Act and the claim was barred by an inordinate delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126050482021-28-08-2025
The Tribunal directed the respondent to bring on record the OC/CC of the 'Sinder's Dump Scheme' project, clarify the status of the unit/agreement cancellation, and provide the current status of the project before the next hearing.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the complaint was not maintainable because the project was not an 'ongoing project' under the Act and the claim was barred by an inordinate delay. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the complaint was not maintainable because the project was not an 'ongoing project' under the Act and the claim was barred by an inordinate delay.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Siddhartha Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Khare
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (7)
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant subject to the payment of a Rs 500 cost for the library and directed the appellant to make alternative arrangements if counsel is unavailable on the next date.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, citing Supreme Court precedents regarding Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex parte against the respondent, Lucknow Development Authority, due to their failure to file objections or appear despite being served notice. The matter is scheduled for an ex parte hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 06.05.2022.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant but imposed a cost of Rs 500/- to be deposited in the Registry before the next hearing date on 16.12.2024.
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent is sufficient via email and post, and granted the respondent one week to file objections to the condonation of delay and the appeal, warning that the matter will proceed ex-parte if they fail to respond.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the complaint was not maintainable because the project was not an 'ongoing project' under the Act and the claim was barred by an inordinate delay.
The Tribunal directed the respondent to bring on record the OC/CC of the 'Sinder's Dump Scheme' project, clarify the status of the unit/agreement cancellation, and provide the current status of the project before the next hearing.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.