Appellant / Complainant
Ram Pratap Yadav
Respondent
Omaxe Limited
omaxe limited
₹6,81,279
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126049582022 by Ram Pratap Yadav against Omaxe Limited before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ram Pratap Yadav, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the appellant is liable to pay charges for increased super area and Prime Location Charges (PLC) as per the terms of the allotment agreement.
Further Order
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to argue his case in person following his counsel's request for adjournment and subsequently reserved judgment on the grievances regarding enhanced area and Prime Location Charges (PLC).
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and adjourned the matter to 22.02.2024 for further orders.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for 11.10.2023.
For Order
The appellant's counsel requested an adjournment, and the Tribunal subsequently listed the appeal for orders on 25-08-2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's reply to the respondent's objections has been filed and, upon joint request of the counsel, scheduled the appeal for hearing on 07.07.2023.
Notice
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent and directed both parties to exchange objections and replies via email and upload them to the e-portal within specified timelines.
Admission
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural requirements for service of notice and exchange of objections between the parties before the next hearing on 27.09.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126049582022-07-05-2024
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ram Pratap Yadav, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the appellant is liable to pay charges for increased super area and Prime Location Charges (PLC) as per the terms of the allotment agreement.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ram Pratap Yadav, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the appellant is liable to pay charges for increased super area and Prime Location Charges (PLC) as per the terms of the allotment agreement. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: SBI's MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ram Pratap Yadav, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the appellant is liable to pay charges for increased super area and Prime Location Charges (PLC) as per the terms of the allotment agreement.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
SBI's MCLR+1%
Interest Period
from the proposed date of delivery of possession mentioned in the allotment letter till 20.02.2021
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Respondent Advocate(s)
- V K S Bisen
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Ram Pratap Yadav, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order that the appellant is liable to pay charges for increased super area and Prime Location Charges (PLC) as per the terms of the allotment agreement.
Need to research all rulings for omaxe limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.