Appellant / Complainant
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
Ajay Sharma, Neeti Sharma
uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126049262023 by Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. against Ajay Sharma, Neeti Sharma before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay, finding the 90-day delay to be willful and deliberate, and consequently dismissed the appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the application for condonation of delay and reserved its judgment on the matter.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final three-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 01.10.2024.
Delay condonation
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previous order passed on a different date in Appeal No. D 7/2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order dated in appeal No. D 6/2024 for further directions.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed the respondent to file objections to the application for condonation of delay within one week.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal provisionally accepted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act following a deposit of Rs. 10,37,282 and issued notice to the respondents regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126049262023-16-01-2024
The Tribunal provisionally accepted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act following a deposit of Rs. 10,37,282 and issued notice to the respondents regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126049262023-02-12-2024
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay, finding the 90-day delay to be willful and deliberate, and consequently dismissed the appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay, finding the 90-day delay to be willful and deliberate, and consequently dismissed the appeal. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay, finding the 90-day delay to be willful and deliberate, and consequently dismissed the appeal.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Naveen Kumar Tiwari
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Samrat Vaish
- Sumit Sharma
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal provisionally accepted the appellant's compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act following a deposit of Rs. 10,37,282 and issued notice to the respondents regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal.
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's application for condonation of delay, finding the 90-day delay to be willful and deliberate, and consequently dismissed the appeal.
Need to research all rulings for uppal chadha hi-tech developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.