Appellant / Complainant
U.P. State Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Reeta
₹36,77,500
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126048962023 by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority against Reeta before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until possession or receipt of completion certificate due to project delays.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed a recall application to set aside an order dated 11.12.2024 that had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the appellant's counsel due to non-appearance.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Delay condonation
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 662/2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 16.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the appellant's counsel to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on September 5, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for orders on 29.07.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal refers to a previous order passed in appeal No. D 660/2023 for the current orders.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional week to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed them to provide a soft copy to the applicant. The matter is scheduled for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 29.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted 10 days to both the respondent and the applicant to file replies and scheduled the matter for hearing on 23.02.2024 regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appellant's application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal, after confirming compliance with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126048962023-29-01-2025
The Tribunal allowed a recall application to set aside an order dated 11.12.2024 that had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the appellant's counsel due to non-appearance.
Tribunal Order #0901126048962023-18-12-2023
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appellant's application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal, after confirming compliance with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126048962023-11-12-2024
The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126048962023-26-03-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until possession or receipt of completion certificate due to project delays.
Tribunal Order #0901126048962023-21-02-2025
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until possession or receipt of completion certificate due to project delays. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until possession or receipt of completion certificate due to project delays.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
from 01.01.2017 till development certificate/ completion certificate or till handing over the possession whichever is later
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
- Sanjeev Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Deepak Dwivedi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal allowed a recall application to set aside an order dated 11.12.2024 that had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the appellant's counsel due to non-appearance.
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appellant's application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal, after confirming compliance with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act.
The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until possession or receipt of completion certificate due to project delays.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.