Appellant / Complainant
U.P. State Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Jaysi Ram Dohare
₹25,36,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126048922023 by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority against Jaysi Ram Dohare before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant promoter's appeal as infructuous because a related cross-appeal had already been decided in favor of the allottee, directing a full refund of the deposit with interest.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding the cross-appeal and has reserved its judgment.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment and scheduled the case for final hearing on 28.07.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
At the request of the parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for orders/hearing on 08.07.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for May 8, 2025.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for orders/hearing on 24.04.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the recall application and set aside the order dated 11.12.2024 which had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the appellant's counsel due to non-appearance.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Delay condonation
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 662/2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 16.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on September 5, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for orders on 29.07.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directs the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. D 472/2023 for the relevant orders regarding this matter.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and scheduled the matter for hearing on 29.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a reply to the objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on February 23, 2024, regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, noting that a mandatory deposit under Section 43(5) has been made and scheduling the matter for hearing on 16.01.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126048922023-18-12-2023
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, noting that a mandatory deposit under Section 43(5) has been made and scheduling the matter for hearing on 16.01.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126048922023-25-08-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant promoter's appeal as infructuous because a related cross-appeal had already been decided in favor of the allottee, directing a full refund of the deposit with interest.
Tribunal Order #0901126048922023-21-02-2025
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126048922023-29-01-2025
The Tribunal allowed the recall application and set aside the order dated 11.12.2024 which had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the appellant's counsel due to non-appearance.
Tribunal Order #0901126048922023-11-12-2024
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant promoter's appeal as infructuous because a related cross-appeal had already been decided in favor of the allottee, directing a full refund of the deposit with interest. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant promoter's appeal as infructuous because a related cross-appeal had already been decided in favor of the allottee, directing a full refund of the deposit with interest.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
till the date of actual payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
- Sanjeev Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Prasoon Kumar Anjor
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, noting that a mandatory deposit under Section 43(5) has been made and scheduling the matter for hearing on 16.01.2024.
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant promoter's appeal as infructuous because a related cross-appeal had already been decided in favor of the allottee, directing a full refund of the deposit with interest.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal allowed the recall application and set aside the order dated 11.12.2024 which had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the appellant's counsel due to non-appearance.
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.