Appellant / Complainant
U.P. State Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Ashish Awasthi
₹36,77,500
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126048892023 by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority against Ashish Awasthi before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to allottees from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed a recall application to set aside an order imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the appellant's counsel due to health issues and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on February 21, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the appellant's counsel seeking an adjournment, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000/- payable by the appellant to the respondent.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directs the parties to refer to the order passed in Appeal No. D 662/2023 for the relevant directions.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the case for hearing on 16.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on September 5, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for orders on 29.07.2024.
Delay condonation
This is a procedural order referring to a previous order passed in appeal No. D 660/2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional week to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the exchange of soft copies between counsel. The matter is scheduled for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 29.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted 10 days to the respondent for filing a reply and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 23.02.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the appellant has complied with Section 43(5) by depositing Rs. 24,11,007/-.
Tribunal Order #0901126048892023-29-01-2025
The Tribunal allowed a recall application to set aside an order imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the appellant's counsel due to health issues and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on February 21, 2025.
Tribunal Order #0901126048892023-26-03-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to allottees from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
Tribunal Order #0901126048892023-21-02-2025
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126048892023-11-12-2024
The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the appellant's counsel seeking an adjournment, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000/- payable by the appellant to the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126048892023-18-12-2023
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the appellant has complied with Section 43(5) by depositing Rs. 24,11,007/-.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to allottees from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to allottees from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
from 01.01.2017 till development certificate/ completion certificate or till handing over the possession whichever is later
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
- Sanjeev Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Deepak Dwivedi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal allowed a recall application to set aside an order imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000 on the appellant's counsel due to health issues and scheduled the appeal for further hearing on February 21, 2025.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to allottees from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the appellant's counsel seeking an adjournment, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000/- payable by the appellant to the respondent.
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the appellant has complied with Section 43(5) by depositing Rs. 24,11,007/-.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.