Appellant / Complainant
U.P. State Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Hemant Kumar Nigam
₹36,77,500
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126048882023 by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority against Hemant Kumar Nigam before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the recall application and set aside the order dated 11.12.2024 which had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the appellant due to counsel's non-appearance.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 662/2023 for further directions.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 16.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on September 5, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the appeal for orders on 29.07.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directs the parties to refer to the order previously passed in Appeal No. D 660/2023 for the substantive directions.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional week to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the exchange of soft copies between counsel, scheduling the matter for hearing on 29.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a reply to objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on February 23, 2024, regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appellant's application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 16.01.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126048882023-26-03-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
Tribunal Order #0901126048882023-21-02-2025
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126048882023-11-12-2024
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Tribunal Order #0901126048882023-29-01-2025
The Tribunal allowed the recall application and set aside the order dated 11.12.2024 which had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the appellant due to counsel's non-appearance.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
from 01.01.2017 till development certificate/ completion certificate or till handing over the possession whichever is later
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
- Sanjeev Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Deepak Dwivedi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
The Tribunal allowed the recall application and set aside the order dated 11.12.2024 which had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the appellant due to counsel's non-appearance.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.