Appellant / Complainant
U.P. State Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Rajkiran Chaurasia
₹36,77,500
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126048862023 by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority against Rajkiran Chaurasia before up_rera.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/- and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal allowed the recall application to set aside a previous order imposing a cost of Rs. 5000/- on the appellant's counsel due to health issues and scheduled the matter for hearing on 21.02.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Delay condonation
The order refers to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D 662/2023 regarding the matter of U.P. State Industrial Development Authority vs. Rajkiran Chaurasia.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.11.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 16.10.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel a final opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on September 5, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for orders on 29.07.2024.
Delay condonation
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated in appeal No. D 660/2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional week to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the exchange of soft copies between counsel. The matter is scheduled for a hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 29.03.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a reply to objections and scheduled the matter for February 23, 2024, to consider an application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the appellant has complied with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126048862023-29-01-2025
The Tribunal allowed the recall application to set aside a previous order imposing a cost of Rs. 5000/- on the appellant's counsel due to health issues and scheduled the matter for hearing on 21.02.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126048862023-18-12-2023
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the appellant has complied with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126048862023-26-03-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
Tribunal Order #0901126048862023-21-02-2025
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/- and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126048862023-11-12-2024
The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
with effect from 01.01.2017 till development certificate/ completion certificate or till handing over the possession whichever is later
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shuchita Singh
- Sanjeev Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Deepak Dwivedi
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal allowed the recall application to set aside a previous order imposing a cost of Rs. 5000/- on the appellant's counsel due to health issues and scheduled the matter for hearing on 21.02.2024.
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding an application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal, noting that the appellant has complied with the mandatory deposit requirement under Section 43(5) of the Act.
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% to the allottee from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/- and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.