up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126048832023

Appellant / Complainant

U.P. State Industrial Development Authority

VS

Respondent

Ajay Singh

Disputed Amount

36,77,500

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

22 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126048832023 by U.P. State Industrial Development Authority against Ajay Singh before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 126/03/2025

Hearing

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.

3
Stage 221/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

4
Stage 329/01/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the recall application to set aside a cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed on the appellant's counsel due to non-appearance caused by health issues, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.02.2024.

5
Stage 422/01/2025

Delay condonation

No text available.

6
Stage 515/01/2025

Delay condonation

No text available.

7
Stage 611/12/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.

8
Stage 713/11/2024

Delay condonation

This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. D 662/2023.

9
Stage 816/10/2024

Delay condonation

At the request of the appellant's counsel, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for a new hearing date on 13.11.2024.

10
Stage 905/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the case for orders/hearing on 16.10.2024.

11
Stage 1029/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 05.09.2024.

12
Stage 1101/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the matter for orders on 29.07.2024.

13
Stage 1201/05/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

14
Stage 1329/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted counsel for the appellant one week to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of the condonation of delay application on 01.05.2024.

15
Stage 1423/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent an additional week to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the exchange of soft copies between counsel. The matter is scheduled for hearing on the application for condonation of delay on 29.03.2024.

16
Stage 1516/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted 10 days to the respondent to file a reply to objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on February 23, 2024, regarding the application for condonation of delay.

17
Stage 1618/12/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent regarding the appellant's application for condonation of a 90-day delay in filing the appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 16.01.2024.

18
Stage 17Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126048832023-29-01-2025

The Tribunal allowed the recall application to set aside a cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed on the appellant's counsel due to non-appearance caused by health issues, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.02.2024.

19
Stage 18Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126048832023-26-03-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.

20
Stage 19Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126048832023-21-02-2025

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

21
Stage 20Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126048832023-11-12-2024

The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession. Awarded in favor of Respondent. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: RespondentInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

from 01.01.2017 till development certificate/ completion certificate or till handing over the possession whichever is later

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Shuchita Singh
  • Sanjeev Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Deepak Dwivedi

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126048832023-29-01-2025

The Tribunal allowed the recall application to set aside a cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed on the appellant's counsel due to non-appearance caused by health issues, and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.02.2024.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126048832023-26-03-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by UPSIDC, affirming the Regulatory Authority's order that the promoter must pay interest at MCLR+1% from January 1, 2017, until the issuance of a completion certificate or handing over possession.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126048832023-21-02-2025

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, subject to a cost of Rs. 1000/-, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126048832023-11-12-2024

The Tribunal adjourned the batch of appeals due to the absence of the appellant's counsel and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →