Appellant / Complainant
Sunil V S
Respondent
Super City Developers Pvt. Ltd.
super city developers pvt. ltd.
Appellant
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126047912022 by Sunil V S against Super City Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the parties to refer to the order passed in a related matter, Appeal No. 571/2022 (Pawan Kumar Pandey Vs. Super City Developers Pvt. Ltd.).
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 23.08.2023, noting that no further adjournments would be granted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply against the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on 02.08.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal condoned a 34-minute delay in uploading the appeal and directed the respondent to file records of basic facilities and amenities as per the allotment documents within one week.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 22.03.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings are complete and, upon the joint request of counsel, adjourned the matter to 12.01.2023 for hearing.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on December 16, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 22.11.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to serve notice to the respondent via dasti summons after postal service failed, and scheduled the matter for 17.10.2022 to consider the application for condonation of delay.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined specific procedural requirements for service of process and filing objections regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126047912022-23-08-2023
The Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the parties to refer to the order passed in a related matter, Appeal No. 571/2022 (Pawan Kumar Pandey Vs. Super City Developers Pvt. Ltd.).
Tribunal Order #0901126047912022-03-05-2023
The Tribunal condoned a 34-minute delay in uploading the appeal and directed the respondent to file records of basic facilities and amenities as per the allotment documents within one week.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the parties to refer to the order passed in a related matter, Appeal No. 571/2022 (Pawan Kumar Pandey Vs. Super City Developers Pvt. Ltd.). Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the parties to refer to the order passed in a related matter, Appeal No. 571/2022 (Pawan Kumar Pandey Vs. Super City Developers Pvt. Ltd.).
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Prashant Chandra
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal allowed the appeal and directed the parties to refer to the order passed in a related matter, Appeal No. 571/2022 (Pawan Kumar Pandey Vs. Super City Developers Pvt. Ltd.).
The Tribunal condoned a 34-minute delay in uploading the appeal and directed the respondent to file records of basic facilities and amenities as per the allotment documents within one week.
Need to research all rulings for super city developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.