Appellant / Complainant
Srinivasan Vaikuntam
Respondent
Wtc Noida Development Private Limited, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority
wtc noida development private limited
₹24,20,000
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126047862022 by Srinivasan Vaikuntam against Wtc Noida Development Private Limited, Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'non-lockable' virtual space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not constitute a separate and self-contained physical apartment.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from the appellant's counsel in the absence of the respondent and reserved the judgment for further delivery.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 01.08.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted time to the appellant's counsel to upload documents and scheduled the next hearing for July 14, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's request for time to prepare his brief and adjourned the matter to 22.05.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 05.05.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 10.04.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 02.04.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment following a request from the respondent's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on March 7, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 12.02.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for orders on January 24, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 17.01.2025 and noted that the matter will proceed ex parte if the respondent fails to appear.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.12.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the matter for its next hearing on November 12, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 01.10.2024.
Hearing
Upon the joint request of the counsels for both parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for a hearing on 30.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 29.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 30.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel for personal reasons and rescheduled the hearing to 28.03.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 22.02.2024 following notice of the appellant's absence.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel on health grounds and rescheduled the hearing for 11.10.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the objection and scheduled the appeal for an order on 25-08-2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for orders on July 7, 2023.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed both parties to exchange copies via email and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 04.11.2022.
Admission
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for service of appeal documents and exchange of objections between the parties.
Tribunal Order #0901126047862022-11-08-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'non-lockable' virtual space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not constitute a separate and self-contained physical apartment.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'non-lockable' virtual space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not constitute a separate and self-contained physical apartment. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'non-lockable' virtual space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not constitute a separate and self-contained physical apartment.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
- Raj Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Arvind Kumar
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'non-lockable' virtual space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not constitute a separate and self-contained physical apartment.
Need to research all rulings for wtc noida development private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.