Appellant / Complainant
Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructures Private Limited
Respondent
Deepak Singhal, Shrarda Singhal
suncity hi-tech infrastructures private limited
₹6,24,750
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126047572022 by Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructures Private Limited against Deepak Singhal, Shrarda Singhal before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the order of the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days.
Hearing
The tribunal granted an adjournment request from the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 11.12.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for final hearing on 11.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of counsel for both parties and scheduled the matter for orders on 22.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondents to argue the matter and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 12.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and the case is ready for hearing; consequently, the matter is rescheduled for orders/hearing on 08.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and rescheduled the appeal for a hearing on 10.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings because the respondent's counsel was absent and rescheduled the hearing for May 9, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ripe for hearing and scheduled it for orders/hearing on 08.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appellant's counsel is ill and has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 04.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders to 27.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 27.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 10-day extension to file a reply to the respondents' objections and directed that a soft copy be emailed to the respondents. The case is scheduled for hearing on 06.04.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondents an additional 10 days to file objections to the grounds of appeal and directed the exchange of documents via email before the next hearing on January 25, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal recorded the respondent's undertaking to file objections and vakalatnama within a week and adjourned the matter for orders to 29.11.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal granted the respondents 10 days to file objections to the appeal and directed the parties to exchange copies via email and upload them to the e-portal before the next hearing on 31.10.2022.
Admission
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents and outlined the procedural requirements for service of appeal documents and the timeline for filing objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126047572022-11-12-2024
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the order of the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the order of the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the order of the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1%
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Himanshu Bora
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Pankaj Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal allowed the appeals and set aside the order of the U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority, ruling that the respondent was not an 'allottee' under Act 2016; consequently, the appellant is directed to refund the deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% within 45 days.
Need to research all rulings for suncity hi-tech infrastructures private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.