Appellant / Complainant
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Ravindra Arora
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126046912021 by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority against Ravindra Arora before up_rera.
Re-Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant-promoter's appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to hand over possession with delay interest or refund the amount, ruling that sending notices to an incorrect address does not absolve the developer of its obligations.
Notice
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 20.03.2025.
Notice
The appellant's counsel filed an application for adjournment, resulting in the matter being rescheduled for hearing on 20.02.2025.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 30.01.2025, directing the registry to issue notice to the appellant regarding the fixed date.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding a previous judgment that may cover the current appeal's issues and subsequently reserved the judgment for delivery.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the prayer clause in the memo of appeal and directed the submission of the amended copy to the respondent for objections.
Hearing
At the request of the appellant's counsel, the tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders or hearing on 24.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 08.05.2024 to allow the parties time to pursue an amicable settlement through negotiations.
Hearing
The Tribunal has issued a routine procedural order to list the appeal for hearing on 05.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appellant failed to file a requested application for rectification/modification of a previous order and subsequently adjourned the matter to 29.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an application for rectification/modification of the order dated 23.05.2023 and scheduled the next hearing for 24.07.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the full amount paid by the allottee plus interest within 10 days, as they are challenging the order regarding unit possession.
For Order
The tribunal adjourned the proceedings of Appeal-785/2021 due to a request from the appellant's counsel for medical reasons and scheduled the matter for orders on 23.05.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for April 17, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment of the proceedings due to the illness of the counsels representing both the appellant and the respondent, rescheduling the hearing for 02.03.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the respondent's submission regarding non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and adjourned the appeal to 30.01.2023 for hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 20.12.2022 to address the point of Section 43(5) of the Act.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 23.11.2022 for further orders as no one appeared on behalf of the respondent.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent time to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the defective appeal for further orders on 01.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal condoned a delay of approximately 293 days in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation period, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that notice was duly served on the respondent and directed the parties to file objections and rejoinders regarding a delay condonation application before the next hearing on 02.08.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted the appellant's failure to serve notice on the respondent and granted a final opportunity for service via speed post and email, scheduling the next hearing for May 25, 2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the appeal via speed post and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing on 25.04.2022.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 31.01.2022 because the appellant failed to appear for three consecutive hearings and has not yet deposited the required amount under Section 43(5) of the Act.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to the appellant's counsel to allow for the submission of details regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and rescheduled the matter to 07.01.2022.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted an adjournment but issued a directive to the applicant to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act before the next hearing on 03.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126046912021-20-03-2025
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant-promoter's appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to hand over possession with delay interest or refund the amount, ruling that sending notices to an incorrect address does not absolve the developer of its obligations.
Tribunal Order #0901126046912021-02-08-2022
The Tribunal condoned a delay of approximately 293 days in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation period, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126046912021-21-12-2021
The Tribunal granted an adjournment but issued a directive to the applicant to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act before the next hearing on 03.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126046912021-24-05-2024
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the prayer clause in the memo of appeal and directed the submission of the amended copy to the respondent for objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126046912021-23-05-2023
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the full amount paid by the allottee plus interest within 10 days, as they are challenging the order regarding unit possession.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant-promoter's appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to hand over possession with delay interest or refund the amount, ruling that sending notices to an incorrect address does not absolve the developer of its obligations. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant-promoter's appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to hand over possession with delay interest or refund the amount, ruling that sending notices to an incorrect address does not absolve the developer of its obligations.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ajay Kumar Gupta
- Rishindra Vikram Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appellant-promoter's appeal, upholding the Regulatory Authority's order to hand over possession with delay interest or refund the amount, ruling that sending notices to an incorrect address does not absolve the developer of its obligations.
The Tribunal condoned a delay of approximately 293 days in filing the appeal, citing the COVID-19 pandemic relaxation period, and directed the Registry to register the defective appeal as a regular appeal.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment but issued a directive to the applicant to ensure complete compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act before the next hearing on 03.01.2022.
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the prayer clause in the memo of appeal and directed the submission of the amended copy to the respondent for objections.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act by depositing the full amount paid by the allottee plus interest within 10 days, as they are challenging the order regarding unit possession.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.