Appellant / Complainant
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
Respondent
Gaurav Srivastava
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126046352021 by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority against Gaurav Srivastava before up_rera.
For Order
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the defective appeal following an amicable settlement and directed the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) via RTGS upon receipt of a formal application and bank details.
For Order
The court adjourned the proceedings due to requests for adjournment from counsel representing both the appellant and respondent. The case is rescheduled for hearing on 04.07.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent following a notice regarding the withdrawal of their counsel's vakalatnama and adjourned the matter to 03.05.2023, warning that the case will proceed based on available records if no one appears.
For Order
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the withdrawal of their counsel's Vakalatnama and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 24.03.2023.
For Order
This document appears to be the header/caption of an appeal (APPEAL-737/2021) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal involving Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority and Gaurav Srivastava, but it contains no substantive ruling or directive.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the applicant to reply. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 15.11.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a short adjournment as the parties indicated that a settlement is likely to be reached, listing the defective appeal for further orders on 19.10.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal allowed the respondent's application for mediation/settlement and adjourned the defective appeal to 23.09.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the possibility of an out-of-court settlement between the parties and adjourned the matter to 25.08.2022 for hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the possibility of a settlement between the parties and adjourned the appeal to 11.07.2022 for further orders.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 02.05.2022 for the disposal of a limitation application and its objections, noting that the parties are likely to reach a settlement.
Further Order
The Tribunal noted the appellant's submission that a settlement is likely between the parties and ordered the defective appeal to be listed on 23.03.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of both the appellant and the respondent and scheduled the matter for further orders on 31.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the appellant failed to take necessary steps following the order dated 15.11.2021 and directed the appellant to serve notice upon the respondent within one week, rescheduling the matter for 07.01.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post and email due to non-compliance/absence and scheduled the defective appeal for further hearing on 10.12.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126046352021-04-07-2023
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the defective appeal following an amicable settlement and directed the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) via RTGS upon receipt of a formal application and bank details.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the defective appeal following an amicable settlement and directed the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) via RTGS upon receipt of a formal application and bank details. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the defective appeal following an amicable settlement and directed the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) via RTGS upon receipt of a formal application and bank details.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ajay Kumar Gupta
- Rishindra Vikram Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Kaviya Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to withdraw the defective appeal following an amicable settlement and directed the release of the amount deposited under Section 43(5) via RTGS upon receipt of a formal application and bank details.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.