up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126045422024

Appellant / Complainant

Devendra Nath Shukla

VS

Respondent

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad

Disputed Amount

1,77,050

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

14 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126045422024 by Devendra Nath Shukla against U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 101/12/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order that had dismissed the complaint on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to quasi-judicial bodies like RERA and directing the Authority to decide the complaint on merits regarding delayed interest.

3
Stage 216/10/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels regarding the appeal and has reserved the judgment for a later date.

4
Stage 317/09/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the appellant time to argue the matter and scheduled the next hearing for October 16, 2025.

5
Stage 428/08/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to condone a 30-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the registry to allot a regular number to the case.

6
Stage 511/08/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.08.2025.

7
Stage 624/07/2025

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file a rejoinder affidavit and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.08.2025.

8
Stage 702/07/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the appellant a final 10-day extension to file a rejoinder and scheduled the next hearing for July 24, 2025.

9
Stage 812/05/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a rejoinder affidavit within ten days regarding the respondent's objections to the delay condonation application and the memo of appeal.

10
Stage 917/04/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent seven days to file an objection after the appellant agreed to supply a copy of the memo of appeal within three days; the matter is listed for 12.05.2025.

11
Stage 1020/03/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed the appellant to provide copies of the memo of appeal and supporting documents to the respondent's counsel before the next hearing on 17.04.2025.

12
Stage 1124/02/2025

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the application for condonation of delay and memo of appeal via speed-post and email, with the matter listed for hearing on 20.03.2025.

13
Stage 12Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126045422024-01-12-2025

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order that had dismissed the complaint on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to quasi-judicial bodies like RERA and directing the Authority to decide the complaint on merits regarding delayed interest.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order that had dismissed the complaint on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to quasi-judicial bodies like RERA and directing the Authority to decide the complaint on merits regarding delayed interest. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order that had dismissed the complaint on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to quasi-judicial bodies like RERA and directing the Authority to decide the complaint on merits regarding delayed interest.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Interest Period

from 1/05/2015 to 12/10/2018

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Shuchita Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • N N Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126045422024-01-12-2025

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's order that had dismissed the complaint on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to quasi-judicial bodies like RERA and directing the Authority to decide the complaint on merits regarding delayed interest.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for a builder?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →