Appellant / Complainant
Sonia Chaudhary
Respondent
Yamnua Expressway Industrial Development Authority
₹2,36,465
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126045342022 by Sonia Chaudhary against Yamnua Expressway Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund, due to project delay and the authority exceeding its jurisdiction by granting possession instead of the requested refund.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties regarding the appeal and subsequently reserved the judgment for further delivery.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to amend the grounds of appeal in compliance with a previous order and scheduled the case for orders on January 31, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant, Sonia Chaudhary, and rescheduled the hearing for January 17, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application to amend the grounds in the memo of appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 06.12.2024.
Hearing
The appellant's counsel withdrew a pending amendment application with liberty to file a fresh one, and the matter was adjourned to 07.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the amended memo of appeal and directed the matter to be listed for hearing on 01.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections to the appellant's amendment application and directed the exchange of documents via email before listing the matter for hearing on 31.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment of the proceedings due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for July 2, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to incorporate grounds of appeal due to the absence of a supporting affidavit and requisite stamp fee, while allowing the applicant to file a corrected application. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 02.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an amendment application to incorporate grounds of appeal following an objection by the respondent's counsel, and scheduled the next hearing for 01.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to seek instructions regarding documents uploaded by the appellant and scheduled the next hearing for March 13, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel to prepare their brief and rescheduled the hearing for 30.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment as the appellant's counsel was unprepared, rescheduling the hearing to 17.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the appellant's counsel to examine the Act and distinguish cited judgments, rescheduling the hearing for 13.04.2023.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal adjourned the proceedings of Appeal-585/2022 due to a request for adjournment by the respondent's counsel on health grounds, rescheduling the hearing to 04.04.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal difficulty and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.03.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a supplementary affidavit in response to additional documents submitted by the appellant and scheduled the hearing for January 17, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant two weeks to file a reply to the respondent's objection and scheduled the next hearing for December 20, 2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections and Vakalatnama, with a subsequent one-week deadline for the appellant to file a reply, and scheduled the hearing for 23.11.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal found service of notice on the respondent sufficient and granted a 10-day extension for filing objections, noting that the matter may proceed ex-parte if the respondent fails to appear or file objections by the next date.
Admission
The Tribunal found the appeal to be within the limitation period and issued notice to the respondent, directing the appellant to serve the notice and providing a schedule for filing objections and replies.
Tribunal Order #0901126045342022-16-04-2025
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund, due to project delay and the authority exceeding its jurisdiction by granting possession instead of the requested refund.
Tribunal Order #0901126045342022-01-04-2024
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to incorporate grounds of appeal due to the absence of a supporting affidavit and requisite stamp fee, while allowing the applicant to file a corrected application. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 02.05.2024.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund, due to project delay and the authority exceeding its jurisdiction by granting possession instead of the requested refund. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund, due to project delay and the authority exceeding its jurisdiction by granting possession instead of the requested refund.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR+1%
Interest Period
from the date of deposit till the date of actual refund
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Vipin Verma
- N A
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Rajesh Chadha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's entire deposited amount with interest at MCLR+1% from the date of deposit until actual refund, due to project delay and the authority exceeding its jurisdiction by granting possession instead of the requested refund.
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to incorporate grounds of appeal due to the absence of a supporting affidavit and requisite stamp fee, while allowing the applicant to file a corrected application. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 02.05.2024.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.