Appellant / Complainant
Fragrance Dream Homes Pvt Ltd
Respondent
Sunil Bailwal
fragrance dream homes pvt ltd
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126044992024 by Fragrance Dream Homes Pvt Ltd against Sunil Bailwal before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the amount deposited by the promoter be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has listed a defective appeal for hearing on 18.08.2025 to consider an application for condonation of delay and directed the parties to exchange pleadings in the interim.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder against the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for 23.07.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to issue notice to the respondent after technical issues prevented its generation, and scheduled the next hearing for July 2, 2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the application for condonation of delay and memo of appeal via speed-post and email, scheduling the matter for hearing on 20.05.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a 7-day extension to deposit the required amount due to technical glitches and scheduled the next hearing for 23.04.2025.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and the failure to hand over possession as previously directed, granting the appellant three weeks to rectify these compliance issues.
Tribunal Order #0901126044992024-17-03-2025
The Tribunal noted non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and the failure to hand over possession as previously directed, granting the appellant three weeks to rectify these compliance issues.
Tribunal Order #0901126044992024-18-08-2025
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the amount deposited by the promoter be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the amount deposited by the promoter be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the amount deposited by the promoter be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rajan Mishra
- Umesh Chandra Tripathi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Sudhir Kumar Shrivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal noted non-compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and the failure to hand over possession as previously directed, granting the appellant three weeks to rectify these compliance issues.
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for condonation of delay due to insufficient explanation and dismissed the appeal, subsequently ordering that the amount deposited by the promoter be transferred to UPRERA for disbursement.
Need to research all rulings for fragrance dream homes pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.