Appellant / Complainant
Supertech Limited
Respondent
Arvind Kumar Singh
supertech limited
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126044622021 by Supertech Limited against Arvind Kumar Singh before up_rera.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The present defective appeal was dismissed as withdrawn following the counsel's submission that instructions were received from the IRP to withdraw due to a moratorium declared by the NCLT.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the appellant's counsel to obtain instructions from the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) appointed by the NCLT and rescheduled the matter for 22.04.2022.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a personal affidavit clarifying the instructions received regarding non-compliance with Section 43(5) pre-deposit requirements and noted that the appellant's changing stance appears to be an attempt to delay proceedings.
Compliance of section 43(5)
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding mandatory deposits, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000 for the delay and warning that failure to comply will result in dismissal of the appeal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act and submit a CA certificate, warning that failure to do so by the next hearing will result in dismissal of the appeal.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to rectify registry defects and deposit the required fee of Rs. 1000, while also complying with Section 43(5) of the Act before the next hearing on 13.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126044622021-21-03-2022
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a personal affidavit clarifying the instructions received regarding non-compliance with Section 43(5) pre-deposit requirements and noted that the appellant's changing stance appears to be an attempt to delay proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126044622021-24-02-2022
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act and submit a CA certificate, warning that failure to do so by the next hearing will result in dismissal of the appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126044622021-09-03-2022
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding mandatory deposits, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000 for the delay and warning that failure to comply will result in dismissal of the appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed as withdrawn Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed as withdrawn
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Inder Preet Chadha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to file a personal affidavit clarifying the instructions received regarding non-compliance with Section 43(5) pre-deposit requirements and noted that the appellant's changing stance appears to be an attempt to delay proceedings.
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the appellant to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act and submit a CA certificate, warning that failure to do so by the next hearing will result in dismissal of the appeal.
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to comply with Section 43(5) of the Act regarding mandatory deposits, imposing a cost of Rs. 5,000 for the delay and warning that failure to comply will result in dismissal of the appeal.
Need to research all rulings for supertech limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.