Appellant / Complainant
Ripun Chadha, Umang Chadha
Respondent
M. R. DD Developers
m. r. dd developers
₹37,04,220
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126043742024 by Ripun Chadha, Umang Chadha against M. R. DD Developers before up_rera.
Admission
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for refund, ruling that the second complaint was misconceived because the previous settlement and possession had already been satisfied, and directed the respondent to execute the conveyance deed for the unit within 60 days.
Admission
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 23.09.2025 following a joint request from both parties.
Admission
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter, scheduling the next hearing for September 4, 2025, and extended any existing interim orders until that date.
Admission
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the next hearing on 20.08.2025 but issued a strict warning that no further adjournments will be granted to the respondent, noting that the appeal will proceed ex parte if they fail to appear.
Admission
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 25.07.2025, while maintaining any existing interim relief orders.
Admission
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal hearing to July 4, 2025, while maintaining any existing interim orders.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file a rejoinder affidavit in response to the respondent's objections and extended any existing interim orders until the next hearing on 07.05.2025.
Admission
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 17.04.2025 upon the joint request of the parties and directed the completion of pleadings in the interim, while maintaining any existing interim relief.
Admission
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent despite service of notice and adjourned the matter to 19.03.2025, while directing the exchange of pleadings and extending any existing interim orders.
Admission
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 20.02.2025, while extending any existing interim orders.
Admission
The Tribunal noted the service of notice upon the respondent and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 31.01.2025, while maintaining any existing interim orders.
Admission
The Tribunal has stayed the operation of the Regulatory Authority's order dated 23.09.2024, which had directed the cancellation of a residential unit, and has issued notice to the respondent for the next hearing on 10.01.2025.
Tribunal Order #0901126043742024-23-09-2025
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for refund, ruling that the second complaint was misconceived because the previous settlement and possession had already been satisfied, and directed the respondent to execute the conveyance deed for the unit within 60 days.
Tribunal Order #0901126043742024-02-12-2024
The Tribunal has stayed the operation of the Regulatory Authority's order dated 23.09.2024, which had directed the cancellation of a residential unit, and has issued notice to the respondent for the next hearing on 10.01.2025.
Tribunal Order #0901126043742024-25-07-2025
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the next hearing on 20.08.2025 but issued a strict warning that no further adjournments will be granted to the respondent, noting that the appeal will proceed ex parte if they fail to appear.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for refund, ruling that the second complaint was misconceived because the previous settlement and possession had already been satisfied, and directed the respondent to execute the conveyance deed for the unit within 60 days. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for refund, ruling that the second complaint was misconceived because the previous settlement and possession had already been satisfied, and directed the respondent to execute the conveyance deed for the unit within 60 days.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shishir Kumar Saxena
- Shivam Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Shukla
- Manish Kumar Mishra
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order for refund, ruling that the second complaint was misconceived because the previous settlement and possession had already been satisfied, and directed the respondent to execute the conveyance deed for the unit within 60 days.
The Tribunal has stayed the operation of the Regulatory Authority's order dated 23.09.2024, which had directed the cancellation of a residential unit, and has issued notice to the respondent for the next hearing on 10.01.2025.
The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the next hearing on 20.08.2025 but issued a strict warning that no further adjournments will be granted to the respondent, noting that the appeal will proceed ex parte if they fail to appear.
Need to research all rulings for m. r. dd developers?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.