Appellant / Complainant
Urbanac Developers And Co
Respondent
U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority
urbanac developers and co
₹99,54,00,000
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126043492024 by Urbanac Developers And Co against U.P. Real Estate Regulatory Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order rejecting the appellant's project registration and quashed the underlying public notice/resolution, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using registration denials as a coercive tool to recover debts from a third-party developer (Ansals).
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has heard arguments from both parties and reserved the judgment for a later date.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to February 28, 2025, at 01:30 p.m. upon the request of the counsel for both parties.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 27.02.2025 and directed the respondent to place on record decisions made by the Regulatory Authority in its 84th and 155th meetings.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's amendment application to challenge the notification dated 25.03.2022, ruling that the limitation period begins from the date of the impugned order rather than the notification itself.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted the Respondent one week to file objections to an amendment application and scheduled the next hearing for 19.02.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Notice
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the rejection of a project registration based on a notification cautioning against investments in projects by M/s. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd., and granted parties time to file objections and an amendment application challenging said notification.
Notice
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 30.01.2025 for orders/hearing and directed the respondent to file objections in the interim.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and established a procedural timeline for service of appeal documents and filing of objections before the next hearing on 09.01.2025.
Tribunal Order #0901126043492024-11-03-2025
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order rejecting the appellant's project registration and quashed the underlying public notice/resolution, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using registration denials as a coercive tool to recover debts from a third-party developer (Ansals).
Tribunal Order #0901126043492024-19-02-2025
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's amendment application to challenge the notification dated 25.03.2022, ruling that the limitation period begins from the date of the impugned order rather than the notification itself.
Tribunal Order #0901126043492024-30-01-2025
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the rejection of a project registration based on a notification cautioning against investments in projects by M/s. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd., and granted parties time to file objections and an amendment application challenging said notification.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order rejecting the appellant's project registration and quashed the underlying public notice/resolution, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using registration denials as a coercive tool to recover debts from a third-party developer (Ansals). Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order rejecting the appellant's project registration and quashed the underlying public notice/resolution, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using registration denials as a coercive tool to recover debts from a third-party developer (Ansals).
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Krishna Kumar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shireesh Kumar
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order rejecting the appellant's project registration and quashed the underlying public notice/resolution, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using registration denials as a coercive tool to recover debts from a third-party developer (Ansals).
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's amendment application to challenge the notification dated 25.03.2022, ruling that the limitation period begins from the date of the impugned order rather than the notification itself.
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding the rejection of a project registration based on a notification cautioning against investments in projects by M/s. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd., and granted parties time to file objections and an amendment application challenging said notification.
Need to research all rulings for urbanac developers and co?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.