Appellant / Complainant
Smritee Chaturvedi
Respondent
Kamdhenu Realty Pvt Ltd
kamdhenu realty pvt ltd
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126043332021 by Smritee Chaturvedi against Kamdhenu Realty Pvt Ltd before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed following an amicable settlement reached between the appellant and the respondent.
Hearing
The appellant's counsel acknowledged receipt of a Rs. 2,00,000/- demand draft from the respondent and requested seven days to seek instructions and file an application for withdrawal of the appeal.
Hearing
The Tribunal notes that the principal amount has been paid and directs the parties to finalize a settlement deed regarding the remaining interest of approximately Rs. 2 lakhs, with the respondent to transfer funds via RTGS upon signing.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 31.05.2024 to allow the parties time to finalize an ongoing amicable settlement.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 22.05.2024 due to the appellant's counsel being out of station.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to April 23, 2024, to allow for ongoing negotiations regarding an amicable settlement between the parties.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to April 1, 2024, to allow the parties time to pursue an amicable settlement regarding the refund of amounts to the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions regarding the admissibility of interest for a delay refund under Section 18(1) and adjourned the matter to March 18, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and ordered the matter to be listed for further hearing on 15.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted that the appeal is ripe for hearing and scheduled it for a hearing on 26.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-883/2021 to 11.07.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 07.07.2023 and directed the appellant's counsel to file a reply to the respondent's objections at least 10 days before the next hearing.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply against the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on May 22, 2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections and directed the Registry to rectify the appeal's status from 'defective' to 'regular' if no actual defects are found.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final one-week extension to file objections and directed the exchange of documents via email before the next hearing on 25.01.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel three days to file a legible copy of the BBA/Annexure No. 3 and scheduled the defective appeal for further orders on December 19, 2022.
For Order
The Tribunal allowed an application for condonation of delay in filing objections and directed the applicant to submit legible copies of BBA/Annexure No. 3 within one week.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that no one was present to press the application for recall of the order dated 01.08.2022 and scheduled the matter for further orders on 19.10.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file a better affidavit in support of their application for the recall of the order dated 01.08.2022 and listed the matter for 30.09.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file a better affidavit for the recall of the order dated 01.08.2022 and scheduled the application for hearing on 16.09.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the respondent three days to file an application seeking to recall the order dated 01.08.2022 and scheduled the case for orders on 30.08.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice via the respondent's registered email ID is sufficient and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and the grounds of appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to file an affidavit of service and scheduled the defective appeal for a hearing on 01.08.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to being out of station and directed the filing of an affidavit of service, listing the matter for 22.07.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of the applicant and adjourned the matter to 26.05.2022 in the interest of justice.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the appearance of counsel for the appellant, who undertook to file a vakalatnama and affidavit of service within a week, and adjourned the matter to 10.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued fresh notice to the respondent and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed post and email, scheduling the next hearing for 15.04.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal noted that the applicant removed registry defects but observed the appeal was filed out of time; it directed notice to be issued to the respondent and scheduled the matter for 06.01.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126043332021-01-08-2022
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice via the respondent's registered email ID is sufficient and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and the grounds of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126043332021-31-05-2024
The Tribunal notes that the principal amount has been paid and directs the parties to finalize a settlement deed regarding the remaining interest of approximately Rs. 2 lakhs, with the respondent to transfer funds via RTGS upon signing.
Tribunal Order #0901126043332021-27-02-2023
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections and directed the Registry to rectify the appeal's status from 'defective' to 'regular' if no actual defects are found.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed as not pressed Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed as not pressed
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Krishna Kumar Singh
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Aniket Raj
- Anikesh Raj
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice via the respondent's registered email ID is sufficient and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the condonation of delay application and the grounds of appeal.
The Tribunal notes that the principal amount has been paid and directs the parties to finalize a settlement deed regarding the remaining interest of approximately Rs. 2 lakhs, with the respondent to transfer funds via RTGS upon signing.
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections and directed the Registry to rectify the appeal's status from 'defective' to 'regular' if no actual defects are found.
Need to research all rulings for kamdhenu realty pvt ltd?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.