Appellant / Complainant
Gorakhpur Development Authority
Respondent
Sarita Mishra
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126042972024 by Gorakhpur Development Authority against Sarita Mishra before up_rera.
Hearing on Recall App
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone delay and recall a previous dismissal order, finding the explanation for the three-year delay unsatisfactory. Additionally, the court directed the registry to transfer funds deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act to RERA.
Tribunal Order #0901126042972024-18-11-2024
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone delay and recall a previous dismissal order, finding the explanation for the three-year delay unsatisfactory. Additionally, the court directed the registry to transfer funds deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act to RERA.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone delay and recall a previous dismissal order, finding the explanation for the three-year delay unsatisfactory. Additionally, the court directed the registry to transfer funds deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act to RERA. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone delay and recall a previous dismissal order, finding the explanation for the three-year delay unsatisfactory. Additionally, the court directed the registry to transfer funds deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act to RERA.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application to condone delay and recall a previous dismissal order, finding the explanation for the three-year delay unsatisfactory. Additionally, the court directed the registry to transfer funds deposited by the promoter under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act to RERA.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.