Appellant / Complainant
Sujit Kumar Sahu, Kavita Sahu
Respondent
Lucknow Development Authority
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126042522024 by Sujit Kumar Sahu, Kavita Sahu against Lucknow Development Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned an 8-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal; judgment on the main appeal has been reserved.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal issued notice to the Lucknow Development Authority returnable on 23.04.2025 and outlined the procedural requirements for service of notice and filing of objections regarding the application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126042522024-29-08-2025
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Tribunal Order #0901126042522024-23-04-2025
The Tribunal condoned an 8-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal; judgment on the main appeal has been reserved.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Hridesh Srivastava
- Amit Yadav
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal quashed the Regulatory Authority's orders that had rejected complaints on limitation grounds, ruling that the Limitation Act does not apply to RERA proceedings and that promoters cannot evade statutory interest obligations by citing delay or the execution of conveyance deeds.
The Tribunal condoned an 8-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal; judgment on the main appeal has been reserved.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.