Appellant / Complainant
CFM Asset Reconstruction Private Ltd.
Respondent
Ajnara Realtech Pvt. Limited, Parmod Gupta, Lee Garden Ph3 Welfare Society
ajnara realtech pvt. limited
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126041682023 by CFM Asset Reconstruction Private Ltd. against Ajnara Realtech Pvt. Limited, Parmod Gupta, Lee Garden Ph3 Welfare Society before up_rera.
Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by an Asset Reconstruction Company, ruling that the appellant lacked the locus standi to challenge the RERA order as it was not an aggrieved person or promoter under the Act.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellant's counsel during the hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for orders to be heard on 18.09.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the case for orders on 02.09.2025.
Hearing
Upon a joint request from the parties, the Tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for orders/hearing on 12.08.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for July 4, 2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to seek clarification from the N.C.L.A.T. regarding the impact of a recent N.C.L.A.T. order on project construction and payments, and adjourned the matter to 06.05.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the hearing of the appeal to 03.04.2025 upon the joint request of the counsel and directed the exchange of pleadings in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a proposal on how it intends to satisfy the appellant's dues of Rs. 49.63 Crore and ordered Respondent No. 2 to provide a status update on the construction of the respective towers.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment and directed the parties to exchange pleadings before the next hearing scheduled for 11.02.2025.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 17.01.2025 for orders and directed that pleadings be completed in the interim.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 11.12.2024, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned a three-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular one, with the next hearing scheduled for November 11, 2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed respondent no. 1 to upload their objections within three days and granted the appellant seven days to file a reply, with the matter listed for hearing on 22.10.2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted respondents seven days to file objections and directed the applicant to file a reply within one week of receiving the soft copies, scheduling the next hearing for September 12, 2024.
For Order
The Tribunal granted respondents time to file objections to the condonation of delay application and directed the issuance of fresh notice to respondent no. 2, scheduling the next hearing for 09.08.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted respondents 10 days to file objections and the appellant 3 days to file an affidavit of service regarding respondent no. 2, scheduling the next hearing for July 10, 2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal allowed an application to implead UP RERA as Respondent No. 3 and directed the appellant to file an amended memo of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on May 9, 2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the defective appeal for orders on 08.04.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application for impleadment as withdrawn after the counsel requested permission to refile it correctly in the proper folder with a valid affidavit.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file an application to amend the memo of appeal to include U.P. RERA as a respondent and scheduled the matter for hearing on 04.03.2024.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an application for condonation of a three-day delay in filing the appeal and directed the applicant to provide evidence of when the impugned order was received via email.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to address the maintainability of the appeal, specifically questioning how a financial institution qualifies as a 'person aggrieved' under the Act, 2016. The matter is adjourned to 13.02.2024 for submissions on this issue.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant 15 days to file a certified copy of the impugned order and scheduled the defective appeal for further orders on 17.01.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126041682023-20-11-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by an Asset Reconstruction Company, ruling that the appellant lacked the locus standi to challenge the RERA order as it was not an aggrieved person or promoter under the Act.
Tribunal Order #0901126041682023-11-02-2025
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a proposal on how it intends to satisfy the appellant's dues of Rs. 49.63 Crore and ordered Respondent No. 2 to provide a status update on the construction of the respective towers.
Tribunal Order #0901126041682023-17-01-2024
The Tribunal directed the appellant to address the maintainability of the appeal, specifically questioning how a financial institution qualifies as a 'person aggrieved' under the Act, 2016. The matter is adjourned to 13.02.2024 for submissions on this issue.
Tribunal Order #0901126041682023-08-04-2024
The Tribunal allowed an application to implead UP RERA as Respondent No. 3 and directed the appellant to file an amended memo of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on May 9, 2024.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by an Asset Reconstruction Company, ruling that the appellant lacked the locus standi to challenge the RERA order as it was not an aggrieved person or promoter under the Act. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by an Asset Reconstruction Company, ruling that the appellant lacked the locus standi to challenge the RERA order as it was not an aggrieved person or promoter under the Act.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Abhishek Shukla
- Amol Sharma
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shobhit Mohan Shukla
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by an Asset Reconstruction Company, ruling that the appellant lacked the locus standi to challenge the RERA order as it was not an aggrieved person or promoter under the Act.
The Tribunal directed Respondent No. 1 to submit a proposal on how it intends to satisfy the appellant's dues of Rs. 49.63 Crore and ordered Respondent No. 2 to provide a status update on the construction of the respective towers.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to address the maintainability of the appeal, specifically questioning how a financial institution qualifies as a 'person aggrieved' under the Act, 2016. The matter is adjourned to 13.02.2024 for submissions on this issue.
The Tribunal allowed an application to implead UP RERA as Respondent No. 3 and directed the appellant to file an amended memo of appeal, with the matter scheduled for hearing on May 9, 2024.
Need to research all rulings for ajnara realtech pvt. limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.