Appellant / Complainant
Arbind Kumar Bajaj
Respondent
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
₹63,43,485
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126040712022 by Arbind Kumar Bajaj against Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that industrial plots are not covered under the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as the Act's definitions and scope are confined to residential and commercial real estate projects.
Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from the counsel for both parties, and the judgment has been reserved.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on March 1, 2024.
Hearing
The respondent's counsel withdrew his application to recall the order dated 03.05.2023 which had imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/-, and the matter is scheduled for further hearing on 03.08.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent's adjournment request but imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the respondent to compensate the appellant for travel expenses due to the late filing of the adjournment application.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel one week to conduct research regarding the applicability of the Act and Rules to industrial plots and rescheduled the hearing for 03.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to the absence of the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 24.03.2023.
Hearing
This document appears to be a header/caption of an appeal (APPEAL-523/2022) before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal involving Arbind Kumar Bajaj and Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, but it contains no substantive ruling or directive.
For Order
The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 15.11.2022.
Notice
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the appellant's counsel's illness and directed the respondent to provide soft copies of their objections within two days, with the appellant to reply within a week thereafter.
Notice
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent was sufficient and granted a 10-day extension for filing objections, warning that the matter may proceed ex-parte if no appearance or objection is made by the next hearing.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to remove registry defects and directed that notice be issued to the respondent for a hearing scheduled on 02.09.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126040712022-07-05-2024
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that industrial plots are not covered under the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as the Act's definitions and scope are confined to residential and commercial real estate projects.
Tribunal Order #0901126040712022-03-05-2023
The Tribunal granted the respondent's adjournment request but imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the respondent to compensate the appellant for travel expenses due to the late filing of the adjournment application.
Tribunal Order #0901126040712022-02-09-2022
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent was sufficient and granted a 10-day extension for filing objections, warning that the matter may proceed ex-parte if no appearance or objection is made by the next hearing.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that industrial plots are not covered under the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as the Act's definitions and scope are confined to residential and commercial real estate projects. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that industrial plots are not covered under the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as the Act's definitions and scope are confined to residential and commercial real estate projects.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Ankita Saikia
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Ajay Kumar Gupta
- Rishindra Vikram Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that industrial plots are not covered under the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, as the Act's definitions and scope are confined to residential and commercial real estate projects.
The Tribunal granted the respondent's adjournment request but imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the respondent to compensate the appellant for travel expenses due to the late filing of the adjournment application.
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice to the respondent was sufficient and granted a 10-day extension for filing objections, warning that the matter may proceed ex-parte if no appearance or objection is made by the next hearing.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.