Appellant / Complainant
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad
Respondent
Praveen Srivastava
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126039822024 by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against Praveen Srivastava before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and directed the remittance of previously deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the Registry to verify the adequacy of the deposit once the appellant deposits the remaining amount required under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act, 2016.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to fully comply with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, noting a shortfall between the Recovery Certificate amount and the amount deposited.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file calculations regarding compliance with Section 43(5) of the Act and adjourned the matter to 20.11.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to satisfy the mandate of Section 43 (5) of the Act 2016 and listed the appeal for orders/hearing on 04.11.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections, with a requirement for a rejoinder within one week thereafter, and scheduled the matter for hearing on 10.10.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant seven days to file a rejoinder affidavit regarding objections to a delay condonation application and scheduled the next hearing for 18.09.2025.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the appellant permitted to reply within a week thereafter.
Tribunal Order #0901126039822024-22-01-2026
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and directed the remittance of previously deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Tribunal Order #0901126039822024-20-11-2025
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to fully comply with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, noting a shortfall between the Recovery Certificate amount and the amount deposited.
Tribunal Order #0901126039822024-15-12-2025
The Tribunal directed the Registry to verify the adequacy of the deposit once the appellant deposits the remaining amount required under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act, 2016.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and directed the remittance of previously deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and directed the remittance of previously deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Gautam Johri
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Amit Yadav
- V. P. Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad due to non-compliance with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, and directed the remittance of previously deposited funds to U.P. RERA for disbursement.
The Tribunal granted the appellant a final opportunity to fully comply with the mandatory deposit requirements under Section 43(5) of the Act, 2016, noting a shortfall between the Recovery Certificate amount and the amount deposited.
The Tribunal directed the Registry to verify the adequacy of the deposit once the appellant deposits the remaining amount required under Section 43(5) of the RERA Act, 2016.
Need to research all rulings for a builder?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.